Full Question:
Why did the United States develop the island-hopping strategy?
The strategy avoided needless slaughter of the Japanese
The strategy sped up the war
The United States wanted to avoid fighting Japan.
The strategy saved the lives of US soldiers.
Most of the islands were barren and uninhabited.
Answer:
The strategy sped up the war
The strategy saved the lives of US soldiers.
Explanation:
<u>The strategy sped up the war
</u>
The island-hopping strategy Deployed the troops to skip the heavily fortified islands and start by conquering the weaker one. The time to conquer less fortified islands tend to be lesser compared to the heavily fortified one while still effectively diminishing Enemy's power at the same time.
<u>The strategy saved the lives of US soldiers.
</u>
The less fortified islands tend to killed less amount of US soldiers during the occupation process. It is implemented to gradually increase the pressure for the Japanese government to surrender while minimizing the casualties in our army at the same time.
<span>is a term that refers to a country that is formally independent, but under political influence or control by another country. The Marshall Plan was not meant to shut out the Soviet Union or its Eastern European satellite states. Around the late 1940's Eastern Europe had many dependent satellite states.</span>
"People without ability or experience became officials" is some way political machines hurt cities.
<u>Explanation:</u>
A political machine is a collective where an influential leader or small group commands the resources of a supporter and business community that earns incentives for their actions. This success is based on the manager or group's ability to get out the vote on election day for their representatives.
In the late 19th century, many machines emerged throughout towns to serve U.S. immigrants who regarded machines as a means for political conquest. Often, political patronage may involve exchanging money for political assistance.
Answer: reconcentrados" for Cuban rebels
Explanation:
Answer: B. only <em>three-fifths</em> of the enslaved population would be counted when calculating each state's representation in Congress.
The Three-Fifths Compromise was reached during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. The question was whether the slave population would count when determining a state total's population number, which would be used to determine the number of seats that each state would have in the House of Representatives.
The compromise that was reached was to count every three out of five slaves as a person for this purpose. It gave the Southern states a third more seats in Congress than if slaves had been ignored.
