Differences between Cherokee constitution and US constitution?

History

1 answer:

Nana76 [90]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

The differences between Cherokee constitution and US constitution is that the Cherokee was carving out a permanent, independent residence in the United States in the 1820s. The Cherokee nation enacted a Constitution in 1827 that was modeled after the US Constitution, with executive, legislative, and judicial divisions tailored to Cherokee needs. However, the Constitution is the framework for the federal government of the United States. It is the highest form of law in the country. The Constitution creates the branches of government and gives them the power to govern. However, it also protects the citizens of the United States and guarantees their basic rights.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

Please mark me as Brainlineast.

You might be interested in

Why will this year be legit??

Trava [24]

Answer:

Because you get a fresh start on everything and new things are coming out

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

What, in some states, is a valid reason for denying someone the right to vote? A. gender B. race C. criminal conviction D. lack

nexus9112 [7]

C Becuase if you are convicted of a felony you lose your right to vote

4 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What's illegal mean that the Builders of the Transcontinental Railroad used to cut costs and finance railroad construction? rece

polet [3.4K]

Many people used to die working on the railroad.

5 0

3 years ago

Why did some fugitives go to Canada instead of staying in northern states?

olganol [36]

Answer: B

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Briefly explain ONE major difference between Wood’s and Bailyn’s historical interpretations of why the American colonies rebelle

vesna_86 [32]

Answer:

The ONE major difference between Wood’s and Bailyn’s historical interpretations of why the American colonies rebelled against the British is:

According to Wood, the American colonies rebelled and revolted out of reasoned principle. They had the mindset that they were "born heirs of freedom" and that freedom is their everyday life. While, according to Bailyn, the colonies rebelled and revolted due to the rise of conspirators who stood against their freedom.

Explanation:

Wood's and Bailey's historical interpretations of why the American colonies rebelled against the British can be seen from the excerpt. It's evident that their interpretations differ.

Wood revealed that the Americans didn't rebel due to suffering but due to a "reasoned principle". Whereas, Bailey interpreted it to be that the conspirators against the liberty propelled the revolt.

5 0

4 years ago