Answer:
there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
A marketing organization claims that more than 10% of its employees are paid minimum wage.
The null hypothesis is:
The alternative hypothesis is:
If a hypothesis test is performed that fails to reject the null hypothesis, how would this decision be interpreted
i.e Decision Rule: fails to reject the null hypothesis
Then the interpretation of the decision is that, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
We know that:
Substituting known values, we have:
We know that a three-pose portrait package has a sitting fee of $35 and <span> a six-pose package has a sitting fee of $60. The total amount they collect is $690.
</span>
3/5= 3 fifth size strips
You want to find an equivalent fraction with the denominator of ten, correct? Then you would multiply the fraction in a way that will allow you to have a denominator of ten.
So...
3/5*2/2=6/10
You would need 6 tenth size strips.
<span>3x + y = 9 (I)
</span><span>y = –4x + 10 (II)
------------------------
</span>
Pass the incognito "4x" to the first term, changing the signal when changing sides.
<span>-------------------------
simplify by (-1)
</span>
<span>
-------------------------
</span>
<span>
-------------------------
</span>
<span>
-----------
</span>
<span><span>
</span></span><span>Substitute in equation (I) to find the value of "Y".
</span>3x + y = 9 (I)
3*(1) + y = 9
3 + y = 9
y = 9 - 3
Answer:
