Answer:
Provide the buyer with funds for a foreseeable loss beyond the contract
Explanation:
Consequential damages in contracts is different from incidental or actual damages because it causes a loss that impacts the business of the other party beyond the contract horizon, when the opposite party fails to fulfill his side of the contractual obligations.
In the scenario, Nevada's failure to deliver within agreed contractual timing is not just delaying the time of Meatpackers but as a consequence, is also causing them loss in money terms which will impact their business beyond the contract horizon.
Hence an award of consequential damages to Meatpackers will provide the buyer with funds for a foreseeable loss beyond the contract.
Answer:
some goods aren't internationally traded
Explanation:
Purchasing power parity is most popularly known as the PPP. It may be defined as the measure of the prices of the various countries which makes use of the price of some specific goods in order to compare the absolute purchasing capability or power for the countries' currencies.
It is used to measure and compare prices at different locations.
The purchasing power does not hold good in the short to the medium run as different countries produces different goods and as such all the goods are not internally traded all over the locations or countries.
Answer:
$96,870
Explanation:
The understatement of ending inventory causes the cost of goods sold to be overstated and the gross and net income to be understated by the same amount.
If the 2017 ending inventory was understated by $7,100 then the correct net income figure for 2017 will be $7,1000 more that what was reported.
Therefore, 2017 corrected net income
= $89,770 + $7,100
= $96,870
the answer is the letter C
Answer:
Voting correctly is a concept from political psychology that means a vote decision "that is the same as the choice which would have been made under conditions of full information." Measurements of correct votes are used to determine how accurate low-information voters are at determining the candidate or party that best
Explanation:
