Yes there is and it is called
The plantation state
The ocean state &
Little Rhody
Many countries used to rely on an electoral college in order to get public officials elected, however, this system has been criticized for it has been perceived of as unfair in the event of a slight majority in an electoral district overruling the votes of a great number of citizens. At a first glance, it seems to run counter to the intuitive concept of democracy, i.e., the government elected by the majorities. IN the history of the U.S. there have been two or three presidential elections won by the candidate holding the majority of the electoral colleges yet failing to obtain the absolute majority of votes.
A solution often proposed to change this is the system of direct election. Under this system, candidates running for public office can only win provided that they manage to get the absolute majority of votes cast. Statistics on the number of votes per candidate and vote ratios are usually made for informational purposes, however, they are irrelevant to determine the final outcome.
I believe it's A.
The Muslims did control Jerusalem for a time, and I believe that they forced the Christians out of it.
Also the Crusaders did sack Constantinople when they were not allowed in by the government there.
I don't know what D is but I'll assume that it is true because I think A is false.
The United States constitution was a highly controversial subject in that some people thought it would give the federal government too much power,while others thought it would give it too little.The compromise was about how much power to leave the individual states.
<span>It means think in terms of the health of the entire planet (globally) and act in accordance to that in your own backyard/town/area </span>
