They became more expressive and politically viewed
Hello!
The correct answer is A. Racial segregation is constitutional if the facilities are the same for everyone.
Plessy vs. Ferguson ruled the "separate but equal" doctrine, which determined that racial segregation in schools was constitutional as long as the schools were the same for all races. This was later ruled as unconstitutional by the Brown vs. Board of Education court case.
I hope this helps you! Have a great day!
-Mal
Answer: I think this is what your looking for ;)
In two areas—one-person, one-vote and racial gerrymandering—this Court has held that there is a role for the courts with respect to at least some issues that could arise from a State's drawing of congressional districts.
Explanation: I may be right or wrong there is a 60/40 chance im right maybe?
The primary goals of gerrymandering are to maximize the effect of supporters' votes and to minimize the effect of opponents' votes. ... By "cracking" districts, a political party would be able to maintain, or gain, legislative control by ensuring that the opposing party's voters are not the majority in specific districts.
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr supported non-violent protest.
For example the Albany movement where Dr. King and peaceful demonstrators were all jailed. Later on they are freed from jail. The Birmingham campaign where protests were held against businesses that only hired “White” Anglo-Saxon Americans or had segregated restrooms. These protests would include sit-ins and marches, which would get them jailed. Dr. King encouraged the nonviolent protest in order for the jails to overflow.
