Explain why British mercantilism was a factor that led to the writing of the US constitution.

History

1 answer:

belka [17]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

British Mercantilism made that the wealth of the British increased while colonies wealth decreased. This discontent lead to the American Revolution and ultimately to write their own constitution in which they set the rules for running their own wealth.

Explanation:

Mercantilism, is an economic policy that sought the increase of wealth by exports. British mercantilism was possible as the British empire had several colonies that produced great quantities of highly desirable goods such as India. They also have the strongest Navy in the world and this led to scientifically increase the wealth of the nation.

However, colonies like United States were not happy with this because the wealth that the British extracted from them was not distributed back to the colonies, and more important the colonist of United States had no representation in the British government, while high taxation was demanded for the U.S. colonist.

This general context in which the mercantilism, the taxation without representation and the unfair distribution of wealth led to United States colonist to sought their independence and create their own constitution.

You might be interested in

These are four of the most important requirements of what religion?

Neporo4naja [7]

1.Must study the Religion
2.Must praise to your god
3.you must be saved
4.idk the last one

8 0

2 years ago

Federalists and Anti-Federalists most disagreed on the answer to which

pav-90 [236]

Answer:

B. Should the Constitution include a list of rights guaranteed to citizens?

Explanation:

Essentially, the basis of the two sides were this: the federalists believed in a strong federal government, and thought the U.S. Constitution would be effective with the listed checks and balances. They were afraid of disorder, and believed a strong federal gov't was necessary to combat this. The anti-federalists believed an additional bill detailing the people's rights should be added because they distrusted the supposed checks and balances. They feared a strong central gov't would lead to an oppression similar to the British monarchy at the time.

3 0

2 years ago

Briefly describe the difference between a government's power and its authority. Then describe a situation in which a government

Papessa [141]

Answer:

The main difference between the power of a government and the authority of a government, and the one that marks the distinction between both concepts, lies in how each concept is carried out: thus, while the power of a government implies a series of attributions and powers that it has to manage and organize the resources of a nation, its authority is the ability it has to impose that power on the citizens of the country.

In this sense, the powers of a government are static, arise from the laws that create and organize them, and are part of the administrative function of the government. Instead, the government's authority arises from the force it has to apply its laws, as well as from the coercion it carries out through its police and military bodies, and from the trust and credit that citizenship grants it.

On many occasions it happens that a government has the power but not the authority to impose a certain regulation: mainly, this occurs when there is social discontent. Thus, for example, a government may apply a law to prohibit protests on the public highway, but it may not have the authority to apply said norm because it does not have the necessary support.

6 0

2 years ago

Why were there few transportation innovations in the south compared to the north

Sladkaya [172]

There were fewer transportation innovations because the rivers were plenty good transportation for farmers and their plantation. I hope I could help :D

6 0

3 years ago

Which of the following are characteristics of soft money?

inna [77]

Answer is C and that’s is my final

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers