3 one and 2 one yiur welcome
Your question is incomplete because it not does not provide the options to choose from, which are the following:
It misuses a statistic to overstate the amount of crime committed in New York City.
It assumes that because one person commits a crime, others will do so as well.
It uses an incorrect appeal to the New York Police Department as an authority.
It assumes that the police policy was the cause of the drop in crime.
Answer:
It assumes that the police policy was the cause of the drop in crime.
Explanation:
In the passage, the speaker does not mention any other causes which may have lead to the reduction of crime in New York City, such as a rise in employment, education and better quality of life. As a consequence, the speaker takes for granted that the only reason for the decrease of the crime rate is the stop-and-frisk policy, which he or she believes should be continued.
Answer:
<em>It is generally a harmless thing.</em>
Explanation:
Is this generally a harmless or harmful thing? Why?
It is generally a harmless thing because adults do reminiscent of the past to evaluate how nice it was then, when the going was good. They reverberate on the yester years when life was still in its natural form. They use to say this taken the current wave of aberration into consideration. They believed that things had really gone wired and wish to reflect on the past when life was the way the Almighty Beingness made it.
