The correct answer is A. It can be more responsive to the interests of citizens.
Explanation
Direct democracy is a form of government in which all members of a community/country/state actively participate in all decisions made there. On the other hand, there is indirect democracy, the evolution of direct democracy, in it, the decisions depend on a group of representatives elected by citizens, this modality of democracy has been adopted in most modern states.
Direct democracy has advantages over indirect democracy because it better responds to the interests of citizens as each of them will actively participate in the government, thus allowing decisions to be made and ensuring that their interests are taken into account. On the other hand, in indirect democracy, once you elect your representative, you have no direct control over the decisions he makes, regardless of whether they go against your interests. Therefore, the correct answer is A. It can be more responsive to the interests of citizens.
 
        
             
        
        
        
....................................News papers
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
B, Asia, to retaliate for the attack on Pearl Harbor
 
        
             
        
        
        
What they have in common is that both actions require consent of the senate. The senate has to vote with a majority for those things to come into effect Hope this helps!
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Berlin Conferences I hope that helped