1. The importance of helmets
2. Reasons that drove Irish people out of their country
Answer:
By following the structure of a haiku poem, the author achieves several things. First, as the author can only use a few words, the haiku gives the impression that its words have been chosen with a lot of care, and that no other one can substitute them. More importantly, the haiku allows the author to show that even the most mundane things explained in simple ways can hold a lot of beauty and meaning. The line structure helps describe the subject by allowing the author to focus on a single major event or characteristic and explain it in the most vivid way possible.
A haiku achieves a very different effect on the reader than a longer poem. A longer poem transmits a greater variety of emotions, as the author can vary the mood and tone throughout the text. On the other hand, the haiku delivers a single emotion in a faster and more direct way. Therefore, it helps us focus more deeply on the element that the author is describing.
He relies on experience and is too focused on senses. Plato says the senses are very unreliable.
Aristotle suggests that the morally weak are usually young persons who lack the habituation to virtue that brings the passions of the soul under the internal control of reason. According to Aristotle, like sleepy, mad or drunken persons who can “repeat geometrical demonstrations and verses of Empedocles,” and like an actor speaking their lines, “beginning students can reel off the words they have heard, but they do not yet know the subject” (NE 1147a19-21). A young person, therefore, can “repeat the formulae (of moral knowledge),” which they don‟t yet feel (NE 1147a23). Rather, in order to retain knowledge when in the grip of strong passions, Aristotle asserts that, “the subject must grow to be part of them, and that takes time” (NE 1147a22). Avoiding moral weakness, therefore, requires that we take moral knowledge into our souls and let it become part of our character. This internalization process the young have not had time to complete.
If moral weakness is characteristic of the young who have not yet taken moral knowledge into their souls, thereby allowing them to temporarily forget or lose their knowledge when overcome by desire in the act of moral weakness, it would seem that Aristotle‟s account of moral weakness does not in fact contradict Socrates‟ teaching that no one voluntarily does what they “know” to be wrong. Virtue does in fact seem to be knowledge, and, as Aristotle asserts, “we seem to be led to the conclusion which Socrates sought to establish. Moral weakness does not occur in the presence of knowledge in the strict sense”
I don’t know i need help with mine homework so im pretending to type so sorry for wasting our time love you bae <3
Answer:
I cant answer if I dont have the pages
Explanation:
