Answer:
the Three-Fifths Compromise vs. the Great Compromise
Explanation:
When the Articles of Confederation underwent revision, there were many issues that were discussed. One of the major issues was the debate over the the Three-Fifths Compromise vs. the Great Compromise. According to the Great Compromise, an equal right was to be distributed among the citizens to choose the representatives.
In the Three-Fifths Compromise, no debates were initiated on the issue of the complete abolition of slavery and granting them the citizenship. The slaves were agreed to be counted to be the three-fifth of the individual who were liable for taxation and representation.
- Prisons are supposed to be a public good. I'm not sure if that's still true if the prison is private.
I say the govt should run prisons so you prob ought to get input from someone who says disagrees.
-Companies
have a duty to their shareholders to make as much profit as they can.
They have no duty to the tax payer. The part of your taxes that is
allocated for prisons is supposed to pay for the welfare and
rehabilitation of prisoners, equipment, salary, and benefits for staff,
and the buildings. If the company's taking a profit, that money isn't
going toward those items, which increases recidivism rates and overall
costs of running the prison.
He put in the rights of man.
Based on John Locke’s Social Contract, these rights are life, liberty
and the pursuit of happiness. He
believed that government had a duty to uphold these rights if it wanted to
secure t loyalty and obedience of its citizens.
Answer:
True rfhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhj sorry i had to do a minimum of 20 letters or something
