1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SCORPION-xisa [38]
3 years ago
13

Our constitution does not copy the laws of neighbouring states; we are rather a pattern to others than imitators ourselves. Its

administration favours the many instead of the few; this is why it is called a democracy. If we look to the laws, they afford equal justice to all in their private differences; if no social standing, advancement in public life falls to reputation for capacity, class considerations not being allowed to interfere with merit; nor again does poverty bar the way, if a man is able to serve the state, he is not hindered by the obscurity of his condition. The freedom which we enjoy in our government extends also to our ordinary life. There, far from exercising a jealous surveillance over each other, we do not feel called upon to be angry with our neighbour for doing what he likes, or even to indulge in those injurious looks which cannot fail to be offensive, although they inflict no positive penalty. But all this ease in our private relations does not make us lawless as citizens.
–Funeral Oration,
Pericles

Which excerpt from the passage is an opinion?

“Our constitution does not copy the laws of neighbouring states”
“The freedom which we enjoy in our government extends also to our ordinary life.”
“they afford equal justice to all in their private differences”
“we do not feel called upon to be angry with our neighbour for doing what he likes
History
2 answers:
MrRissso [65]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

e

Explanation:

kozerog [31]3 years ago
4 0
I don’t know but hopefully you are able to get the answer
You might be interested in
What actions by the Kulaks put them in direct conflict with the power and authority of stalin
Marina CMI [18]

Answer:

opposing the collectivization of land

Explanation:

The Kulaks were the peasants that were the most prosperous, that new and put in a lot of effort to develop their land, gain more land, and become wealthier because of it. The Soviets though didn't fancied this, as their policy was that everyone should have the same amount of land, and that collectivization should be done to the land. The Kulaks of course opposed this, as they worked very hard to develop and buy their land and cattle, and now they had to give it up tot he others that were less capable than them just because Stalin ordered so. Stalin was not a man that liked to be opposed, so in order to perform the collectivization without any problem, he ordered the deportation and elimination of the Kulaks. The end result was millions of people ending up dead, which were also the most capable people in the rural areas, and that made a big long-term damage to the agriculture and economy of the Soviet Union.

3 0
3 years ago
Who wore Mayan headdresses? a. kings only c. all men b. kings, lords, and warriors d. warriors and lords
netineya [11]

✷ Question: Who wore Mayan headdresses? 

<span>✐ Explanation: The Mayan men always wore headdresses as a daily thing to wear throughout the day. Answer: Choice CHope that helps! ★ If you have further questions or need more help, feel free to comment below or leave me a PM. -UnicornFudge aka Nadia</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following statements best describes French settlers' treatment of Native Americans?
frutty [35]
The correct answer should be
<span>A. French settlers were on friendly terms with Native Americans and they relied on them to provide furs

They needed fur and leather for trading and they worked together with the natives since the natives were excellent hunters and knew the land. So they would give them things like weapons or clothes, and in return they'd get fur and things like that from them.</span>
3 0
4 years ago
Explain what an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory is, and give one or more examples?​
Effectus [21]
An anti Semitic conspiracy theory is a false claim that claims that Jews are behind something that they’re really not, or it blames Jews for something they’re not responsible for. For example, conspiracy theorists and anti semites claim that Jews own all the banks in the world, but that is false. They also have claimed a few hundred years ago that the Jews kill Christian children and use their blood on matzah, but that is also false. All this is done because anti semites are looking for a scapegoat to blame all their problems on, or they just hate Jews
6 0
3 years ago
In 1912 Eugene Debs ran as a 3d party candidate for the Socialist Party. What led to his rise a
dmitriy555 [2]

The correct answer is: B. The increase in the labor unions' political power

Labor Unions were on the rise during the Progressive Era and this enabled Debs, a socialist, to come to power.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the main way in which imperialist nations protected their colonies and trade in the 1800s?
    15·1 answer
  • How did Indus Valley cities differ from cities of other early civilizations?
    15·2 answers
  • How are isolationism and nativism related ? in the 1920s what action did americans take that reveal their distrust of others?
    12·1 answer
  • The power to regulate trade, establish an army, and issue money belonged to the states under our first form of government,
    8·1 answer
  • How did the peloponnesian war mark an important turning point in greek politics?
    14·1 answer
  • Which two of the following are ways in which England's monarchy changed after the Glorious Revolution?
    10·2 answers
  • Marcus arelius achievements
    8·1 answer
  • The following primary source is
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following was the root cause of both Korean and Vietnam wars?
    11·2 answers
  • One purpose of government is to
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!