Answer:
Moral freedom is not the right to do what you want—it is the strength to do what is right. Moral freedom is not the absence of restraint, but rather it is a resolve to honor God’s design of purity and holiness. Moral freedom is liberty that comes from knowing the truth of God’s Word and living in harmony with that truth by the power of God’s Holy Spirit.
Moral freedom stems from genuine love, which is the opposite of lust. Genuine love gives to others, without the motive of personal pleasure or gain. Lust takes from others, with the selfish motive of personal pleasure or gain.
Walk in the Spirit
Genuine love is not the natural bent of the human heart. Only by the transformation of the sinful heart through salvation in Jesus Christ can a person reflect the perfect, genuine love of God in his or her relationships with others.
When you receive God’s gift of salvation, the Holy Spirit indwells your heart and prompts you to walk in obedience to the ways of God and to become like Jesus Christ. (See Ephesians 1:13–14 and John 14:26.) Walking in the Spirit involves applying the Word of God to your life—doing what the Word of God says to do—which leads you to spiritual maturity and moral freedom. “Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfill the lust of the flesh” (Galatians 5:16).
Spiritual, Psychological, and Physical Drives
Moral freedom requires the subjection of your physical and psychological drives to the authority of the Holy Spirit, Who dwells within you as your Guide and Teacher. God designed the spiritual drive to be the strongest—the one that directs everything you think and say and do and desire.
<span><span><span>0000: First airborne troops begin to land.0100: First Navy hands ordered to man battle stations. Landing craft begin to be lowered into the water; paratroopers cut phone lines and knock down telephone poles.0200: First bombers take off to attack targets around the beachhead.</span>Troops survey the rise of the Normandy shore as they prepare to land on June 6, 1944. (Courtesy U.S. Army Center for Military History)</span><span>0300: Gliders begin to reinforce paratroops.0309: German radar detects Allied invasion fleet. Adm. Krancke orders shore batteries to prepare for invasion.0348: German E-boat flotillas and two armed trawlers get under way.0430: First P-47s take off.0520: Sunrise. Bombers drop first bombs on German targets.0535: German shore batteries open fire; Allied naval forces return fire.0537: E-boats commanded by Adm. Kranche fire torpedoes at Allied destroyers.0600: LCT launch their DD tanks.0620: Allied landing craft approach the beach.0630: H-Hour on Utah, Omaha Beach; LCT 535 lands the first tanks on Omaha; 116th and 16th Infantry land at Omaha; Higgins boats near the beach; 8th Infantry Regiment lands at Utah Beach.0641: USS Corry forced to abandon ship due to heavy gunfire and mine damage.</span><span>"Evacuating Wounded Soldiers" by Harrison Standley suggest the human toll taken by the Normandy Invasion. (Courtesy U.S. Army Center For Military History)<span>0645: Rangers assault Point-du-Hoc; 70th Tank Battalion begins to land at Utah.0725: H-Hour for Sword Beach; British 3rd Division begins to land.0735: British UDT and Royal Engineers land at Gold Beach, followed by Infantry from the 50th Division.0800: 3rd Canadian Division lands at Juno Beach.</span></span><span>0830: LCM, LCT and LSTs land armor at Omaha.0900: 2nd Ranger Battalion soldiers take Point-du-Hoc and defend it for the rest of the day.0950: Destroyers engage the enemy for at Omaha under orders of Adm. C.F. Bryant; 18th Infantry goes ashore at Omaha.1030: 115th Infantry lands at Omaha.1030: 12th Infantry lands at Utah.1045: Utah fairly secure, reserve battalions coming ashore.1100: 18th Infantry begins to land at Omaha.1110: 101st and 4th divisions linkup on Utah securing the first exit from the beach.1300: Troops at Omaha begin to secure the beach.1600: Hitler finally gives approval to release Panzer divisions.1800: Elements of the 3rd Canadian Div, North Nova Scotia Highlanders reach five kilometers inland. 1st Hussar tanks cross the Caen-Bayeux railway, fifteen kilometers inland. Canadian Scottish link up with the 50th Division at Creully.1900: 1st Division commander, General Huebner sets up command post on Omaha.
<span>http://www.military.com/Content/MoreContent1/?file=dday_timeline
</span></span></span>
As Mikhail Gorbachev was appointed as General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, this is, leader of the government, he offered to allow for more openness in the traditionally rigid and dictatorial Soviet regime through a series of policies called <em>Perestroika. </em>Abroad, the president of the United States politically and diplomatically pressed Gorbachev to carry out concrete actions in order to prove the sincerity of his intentions. For that reason, people all over the world demanded the end of the Soviet military intervention in Afghanistan, more civil rights for the Soviet citizens, the destruction of nuclear warheads, and echoing the general sentiment of the time, in a speech delivered by president Reagan in Berlin, near the Berlin Wall dividing the city into a capitalist section and a socialist one, he pronounced his famous words, "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!"
Answer:
Libertarian Party.
Explanation:
I'm going to give you an answer that you likely won't like, especially if you expect the answer to be either the Democrats or the Republicans.
Liberalism has two commonly used definitions.
1. The toleration of other opinions besides one's own. In the beginning, while the constitution was being written. There was a lot of screaming and banging of the order gavil, but that did not mean that there wasn't any respect. Opposing opinions were listened to. The founding fathers took each other's opinions very seriously: all of them were well aware that they were committing treason by considering the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.
2. Liberalism is also a way of looking at money, at society. at individual rights, and at democracy.
Neither the dems or the republicans really take these two views very seriously. They are both more willing to deal with power.
The answer to your question is the Libertarian party. The Democrats used to be concerned about these two points. No longer.