Answer: It is called 'resource partitioning'.
Explanation: The distinct nature of the two species allows them to co-exist in the same premise without any conflict. When one of the species (the diurnal) is out in search of food, the other prefers dwelling on the tree because of its nocturnal nature. Therefore, they are not confronted with each other as predators.
The food that is available at night is consumed by the nocturnal species and the food available during the daytime is eaten up by diurnal species. Hence, there is no competition.
Answer:
C)caffeine is the independent variable
Explanation:
Caffeine is the independent variable and word recall is the dependent variable. Word recall is dependent on the presence or absence of caffeine.
Answer:
Emotional adjustment
Explanation:
This is known as emotional adjustment. This adjustment is the process of adaptation or a condition where a person accepts their circumstances or the situations they find themselves. Emotional adjustment requires that the person modifies his or her attitude and expression to what is appropriate to their situation. These terminally ill people have learnt to accept their situation so they do what they can to enjoy what the they still have.
Answer:
formed between three- city states, ruled from atlantic to pacific and asd far as the Guatemalan border
Explanation:
The Triple Alliance encompasses the military and political alliance among Tenochtitlan, Texcoco and Tlacopan.
Lasting from 1428 until 1521 , the Triple Alliance was formed by the winning sides of a long civil war between Aztecs and former opponents.
<em>The losing side were tributary provinces that were subject to the dominance of the Aztecs. </em>
<em>The Aztecs based their power on a Emperor that had priests and army generals and officers. Eventually they had predominant role over the other city states.</em>
The region they controlled comprehends much of South and Central Mexico and states like today Guatemala.
Answer:
Failure-of-proof defense
Explanation:
Failure of Proof Defense can be defined simply as defendant's acquittal is the result of the prosecution failing to prove one or more of the elements of a crime (Actus Reus, Mens Rea) or leaving reasonable doubt in the mind of the jury.
It usually develops or creates doubt in one or more elements of the offense thereby obstructing the prosecution from meeting its burden of proof.
