A.) ungrammatical usage
This is because, " The ate cow brown the grass " is not grammatically correct.
Answer: Choice A
Choice A goes over a negative aspect about wild animals, while choice B talks about a slight positive aspect in that certain animals can be kept as pets. The two don't really fit together.
In other words, choice A is saying "don't get a wild animal as a pet" while choice B does the opposite (more or less).
While it is true that you can keep some animals as pets, it's not a good idea as choice A mentions. Also, there's the fact that the animal may attack you or people you know if the animal is provoked (even then wild animals can attack seemingly at random). Lastly, there's the fact that wild animals prefer living outside with lots of room to roam around. They don't like being caged up and need to have a specific habitat and diet. All of these facts lean toward having wild animals as pets is a bad idea. This is especially true for large animals in which you'll need more resources to take care of them. A zoo is better equipped to handle the animals.
I think is number one
it's confusing
Personally I would not because what if one was allergic to the smell of certain things. This would cause allergic reactions. I think it was unsuccessful because people already had televisions and having a “Smell-O-Vision” was the same thing but being able to smell.
Answer: •People of all economic and social classes were
starting to drink tea.
Explanation:
Tea sets back then were made of red stoneware and that kind of material came to Europe from China. It was something that can withstand hot water. Tea was a luxury product before the time when people started to produce porcelain, pottery and other material that were good for withstanding hot water. After that, all the people started to drink tea and it was not so luxurious anymore because it was affordable.
