Answer “No one is bound to reveal the truth to someone who does not have the right to know it” . The security of others, their right to privacy, and a respect for the common good are reasons for keeping silent or being discreet in our language concerning matters that should not be disclosed. It is also for these reasons that gossiping is a sinful violation of the privacy of others.
Professionals such as politicians, doctors, lawyers, psychologists, and others in positions where confidences are entrusted should preserve confidentiality, unless there is a grave and proportionate reason for divulging the information. The same is true about ordinary personal relationships in which confidences are shared.
The interaction between Mr. and Mrs. Pontellier establishes the central focus as it moves from a small disagreement between the couple to an argument and silence between the two.
Through questions like yours, it is possible to discover that your question refers to the text that is attached in the figure below.
By reading this text, we can see that:
- The interaction between Mr. and Mrs. Pontellier has, as its main focus, the disagreement between them.
- This disagreement starts with a small discomfort, where Mr. Pontellier wants to talk to his wife, but she is uninterested.
- This disagreement then turns into an argument where Mr. Pontellier accuses his wife of negligence and of being a bad and inattentive mother.
- The argument shakes Mrs. Pontillier and she decides not to respond and causes an uncomfortable silence between herself and her husband.
With this, we can see that the couple has difficulties to live peacefully with each other.
More information:
brainly.com/question/23606786?referrer=searchResults
<span>Women are the main breadwinners in two-thirds of families across the country. - Valid reasoning. This does support the argument by showing the damage the unequal pay does not only to those women, but also to their families.
</span><span>Employers pay different workers different salaries based on skill level. - Invalid reasoning. Women don't demand to be paid more than the men who happen to have better skills, but simply to be paid equally when they have equal skills.
</span><span>Paying people different salaries for the same work is discrimination. - Valid reasoning. That is the basic argument, leveled up. It would be the same as paying all blue-haired men more than the brown or black-haired, when they are doing the same work, with the same skills.
</span><span>Women's incomes are needed for the survival of their families. - Valid reasoning. Just like in the first case, this one shows that this issue doesn't only concern women, but their families - finally, their husbands, the very ones who are paid better for equal work.
</span><span><span>Women are ready to fight back against pay discrimination. - Invalid reasoning. This doesn't have anything to do with the issue itself. It is just a reaction to it, but it doesn't support it.</span>
</span>
