Answer:
i had this on my last year book
lemme see if i can find it
Proto-Mongols. The proto-Mongols emerged from an area that had been inhabited by humans and predecessor hominin species as far back as the Stone Age over 800,000 years ago. The people there went through the Bronze and Iron Ages, forming tribal alliances, peopling, and coming into conflict with early China.
Because back then, they compared the function and status of indian chiefs with the function of status of a king that they usually see.
A king ruled from above, whose words must always be obeyed. An indian chiefs on the other hand, rules from the middle. Even though he is still a respected figure, most tribe members still see their chief as someone with the same status.
I don't know this answer, but if you go to a government website, I'm sure you will find the answer.
To the Greek region, as well as the Greek minorities across the Middle East, most likely considered Alexander a hero. Everyone who was conquered, which were tens of ethnic groups of people across miles and miles of land, most likely considered him a villain.
Alex conquered with a hubris often seen in young dictators (ie. Napoleon, Hitler, etc), but unlike those other examples, Alexander never lost a major battle (as he never went north and invaded the Russian region). While he conquered, ruthlessly, Alexander tore down cultural centers and replaced them with things literally named after him (ie Alexandria, Egypt), which destroyed countless lives and ways of living in the process.
Alexander the Great was a villain, determined on wiping cultures out of his empire and replacing them with various "alexander" named entities.