1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marina CMI [18]
3 years ago
11

Plz help with this and you do not know do not answer

History
2 answers:
AnnZ [28]3 years ago
7 0

Answer

Explanation:

It’s prob 8

Reika [66]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

It is a positive and unifying day for Americans.

Explanation:

It makes sense because if you actually read the questions you can see which one is not negative. :/

You might be interested in
What did Russia realize it needed to do
gayaneshka [121]

Answer: The Treaty of Paris, signed on 30 March 1856, ended the war. It forbade Russia from basing warships in the Black Sea.

Explanation:

Russia was forced to return the city of Kars and all other Ottoman territory which it had taken into its possession. The principalities of Wallachia and Moldovia were thus returned as Ottoman territory, later granted independence and eventually turned into modern-day Romania.

6 0
1 year ago
How did u.s involvement in wwii affect african americans?
Mila [183]
<span>As for many Americans, the Second World War boosted the economic prospects of many African Americans. In particular, war industries created a demand for labor, which many black workers, including black women, were able to fill. Thousands of African Americans moved north to industrial centers, but also to places like California, which saw tremendous population growth during the war due to the war industries that developed there.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these techniques was used extensively during World War I? trench warfare guerilla tactics aerial bombing airborne force
Kamila [148]
It was trench warfare that was used to a great extent in World War I. This led to a significant elongation of the conflict, since targeting soldiers was much harder.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why didn't the border states secede in 1860-1862?
8090 [49]
The main reason why the border states did not secede in 1860-1862 was because they were concerned with the large amount of military coercion that was taking place in the South, and they felt that the South was ultimately unjustified in removing itself from the Union.
8 0
3 years ago
What do scientist think contributed to the development of language?
scoundrel [369]

Answer: Read vvv

Explanation:

As it’s impossible to track words and linguistic ability directly through the archaeological record, scientists have previously attempted to study the evolution of language through “proxy indicator” skills, such as early art or the ability to make more sophisticated tools. The authors of the new study, a team of scientists led by Thomas Morgan, a psychologist at the University of California, Berkeley, took a different approach. Rather than consider toolmaking solely a proxy for language ability, the team explored how language might help modern humans learn to make tools using the same techniques their early ancestors did.

In the experiment, the scientists took 184 volunteers—students from the University of St. Andrews in the United Kingdom—and broke them into five groups; archaeologists then instructed the first person in the technique known as Oldowan stone-knapping. Oldowan tools, named for the famous Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, where archaeologists Louis and Mary Leakey discovered the implements in the 1930s, were widespread among early humans between 2.5 and 1.8 million years ago. The technique consisted of striking a stone “hammer” against a stone “core” to flake off pieces and create a sharp edge that could be used to cut, chop and scrape; the flakes themselves were also sharp enough to use for cutting plants and butchering animals.

Each of the five groups proceeded in different ways: In the first, a pair of volunteers were simply given the stone “core,” a hammer and some examples of flakes, then told to go about their business without guidance. In the second group, the second student learned how to make the tools by simply watching his fellow volunteer (who had been taught the technique) and trying to duplicate his actions without communication. In the third, the volunteers showed each other what they were doing but with no talking or gesturing. The fourth group was allowed to gesture and point, while in the fifth group, the “teacher” was allowed to say whatever he or she wanted to the other volunteers. In the next round of the experiment, the learner became the teacher, creating five different “chains” of transmission; in all, the volunteers produced more than 6,000 stone flakes.

According to the results of the study, published this week in the journal Nature Communications, the first group predictably had very little success when left to their own devices. What was striking, however, was that performance improved very little among those who simply watched their fellow volunteers make the tools. Only those who were allowed to gesture and talk while teaching performed significantly better than the baseline the scientists had established. By one measurement, gesturing doubled the likelihood that a student would produce a viable stone flake in a single strike, while verbal teaching quadrupled that likelihood.

Taking their results into consideration, researchers concluded that early humans might have developed the beginnings of spoken language–known as a proto-language–in order to successfully teach and pass along the ability to make the stone tools they needed for their survival. Such capacity to communicate would have been necessary, they suggest, for our ancestors to make the rapid leap from the Oldowan toolmaking process to more advanced stone tools, which occurred around 2 million years ago.

Dietrich Stout, an archaeologist at Emory University in Atlanta, praised the new study’s innovation, telling Science magazine that “a major strength of the paper is that it adopts an experimental approach to questions that have otherwise largely been addressed through intuition or common sense.” Still, Stout and other scientists urge caution before taking the study’s conclusions at face value without more direct proof. For one thing, the study’s conclusions don’t take into account that the modern volunteers have grown up with language, so it could be expected that they would learn more effectively with it than without; this may not have been true for early humans.

hoped it helped :D

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which country is ruled by a dictator?
    7·1 answer
  • Most historians agree that the first people to inhabit the Americans arrived by way of
    8·1 answer
  • What form of government did the pilgrims establish
    6·1 answer
  • Which Islamic dynasty/caliphate sacked holy cities and made it difficult and dangerous for Christians to make pilgrimages to the
    10·1 answer
  • Which best describes the actions of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee?
    11·2 answers
  • Which description best fits the term prairie?
    8·2 answers
  • Predict what the world might be like if no one tried to think critically. Explain your predictions.
    9·2 answers
  • Please please help me::::(
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following IS NOT a cause of imperialism?Immersive Reader
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following does NOT describe Robespierre?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!