Answer: i think is the third one
Explanation: IM BIG BRAIN
<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
The history of the American Revolution truly starts with the French and Indian War (1754-63), without which no defiance would have occurred when it did. The British assumed control North America toward the finish of the war, administering the district north of Florida and west to the Mississippi River. Investigate the guide above.
Homesteaders wouldn't have parted from Britain on the off chance that despite everything they required their insurance from the French (green), who'd blocked western extension in the Ohio Valley. Americans and Redcoats battled together against the French at the same time, as the maxim goes, recognition breeds disdain, and frontier local armies detested the hatred of their bosses in the British military.
All the more significantly, a few pilgrims didn't feel that they required the British any longer and the populace occupying these developing, asset rich states was for all intents and purposes self-chose for resistance to power, huge numbers of its pioneers having emigrated from the British Isles to look for more noteworthy opportunity.
They bristled under British endeavors to keep them close to the East Coast and squabbled about money-related issues in regards to duties and exchange. By 1763, the time had come to tidy off the Join, or Die. woodcut Ben Franklin had imprinted in 1754 to rally pilgrims in the interest of the British against the French; at the same time, this time, they were reviving against their very own rulers. More than 50,000 took part in the protest.
DRED SCOTT DECISION where the Supreme Court ruling stated slaves did not have a right to sue since they were not citizens, but merely property.
These were their arguments.
<span>Dred Scott:
When a person enters a free State or territory, the free status overrides the previous condition of servitude. Since slavery was forbidden in the free States and territories by
federal and State laws, Dred Scott became free when he entered Illinois and Wisconsin.</span><span>
Sandford:
To deprive a person of property (in this case, Dred Scott) without due process or just compensation violated the 5th Amendment, which states that “No person shall be… deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” Dred Scott was still a slave and no master's property rights could be limited or taken away by a State or federal law.</span>
False is the answer to this question
Answer:
The arrest should be if only nessisary if not should be in jail possibly for a few years but not in prison if had to be in prison try and talk to judge about there opinion it will come in handy
Explanation:
