Answer:
Cucking stools or ducking stools were chairs formerly used for punishment of disorderly women, scolds, and dishonest tradesmen in England, Scotland,[1] and elsewhere.[2] The cucking-stool was a form of wymen pine, or "women's punishment," as referred to in Langland's Piers Plowman (1378). They were instruments of public humiliation and censure both primarily for the offense of scolding or backbiting and less often for sexual offences like bearing an illegitimate child or prostitution.
The stools were technical devices which formed part of the wider method of law enforcement through social humiliation. A common alternative was a court order to recite one’s crimes or sins after Mass or in the market place on market day or informal action such as a Skimmington ride. They were usually of local manufacture with no standard design. Most were simply chairs into which the offender could be tied and exposed at her door or the site of her offence. Some were on wheels like a tumbrel that could be dragged around the parish. Some were put on poles so that they could be plunged into water, hence "ducking" stool. Stocks or pillories were similarly used for the punishment of men or women by humiliation.
The term "cucking-stool" is older, with written records dating back to the 13th and 14th centuries. Written records for the name "ducking stool" appear from 1597, and a statement in 1769 relates that "ducking-stool" is a corruption of the term "cucking-stool".[3] Whereas a cucking-stool could be and was used for humiliation with or without dunking the person in water, the name "ducking-stool" came to be used more specifically for those cucking-stools on an oscillating plank which were used to duck the person into water
Explanation:
Not 30 points btw
Please brainliest =D
The poem has a structure which is very much like the structure of a children´s poem.Meant to be understood by everybody no matter the age group, it has very simple vocabulary.It is structured like a ballad , a song.
All the decisions Farinha made for structuring the poem are linked to the impact he wanted the poem to have.He uses a rhyme pattern that includes the repetition of a line.." And the choirs kept singing of Freedom ..." which serves two purposes.First, it is the chorus in a song.Second, it is the main line in which the theme of the poem is revealed together with the irony of what took place in that church.One goes to church for praying to God Almighty that cares and protects.God protects people who believe in freedom but it seems He was not there that day..." She asked for a blessing but asked for no more.."The unjustice of the event is emphasised by the use of sentences recalling the catastrophe.."On Birmingham Sunday the blood ran like wine.." He provides time and place.Farinha also wants his audience to remember what happened, to learn the names of the victims by numbering them in the poem ..." And Denise Mc Nair brought the number to two.."He appears to be usind the structure of a mathematical addition in order to magnify the harm done by the bombers.Finally , he repeats the same line at the beginning and the end of the poem.." Sing you a song.." .."It´ll do no one wrong"..He does it explaining that he does not want to hurt anyone with his message compared to what some lost souls do to the people and to the world.
2.......4.......5 is the answers
How am i supposed to answer if we can't hear it!?
Answer:
D. A vortex works with water much the same way a tornado works with air.
Explanation:
I got it right on the test
