1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andrey2020 [161]
3 years ago
9

?Before Europeans got involved, what did African slave trade look like?

History
1 answer:
Eddi Din [679]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Regardless of whether slavery existed inside sub-Saharan African Iron Age kingdom before the appearance of Europeans is fervently challenged among African investigations researchers. What is sure is that Africans were exposed to a few types of slavery throughout the long term, including a "customary" structure that believed slaves to be the property of their enslavers. Both supreme Muslims inside the trans-Saharan exchange of slaves and majestic Christian Europeans through the transoceanic exchange of subjugated individuals were enslavers.

Forms of slavery have existed on all continents at different times in history for instance, as a means of exploiting those captured in war especially where there were labour shortages and an abundance of land.

Explanation:

Force labor was normal, Africans and Europeans had been exchanging merchandise and individuals across the Mediterranean for quite a long time however slavery had not been founded on race. The overseas slave exchange, which started as right on time as the fifteenth century, presented an arrangement of servitude that was marketed, racialized and acquired. Oppressed individuals were considered not to be individuals at everything except rather as wares to be purchased, sold and abused. Despite the fact that individuals of African plummet free and slaves were available in North America as ahead of schedule as the 1500s, the offer of the "20 and odd" African individuals set the course for what might become slavery in the US.

You might be interested in
HELP ME PLS I WILL GIVE YOU 20 BRAINLYSSSSS
Ksenya-84 [330]

Answer:

it enforced the law or punish

Explanation:

Roman judicial Branch was made out of six to eight public citizens who acted as judges. They were elected every two years by the people of Rome. They would oversee the courts and monitor their work. When someone would be caught breaking the law, their punishment was decided by the judicial branch.

3 0
3 years ago
2. Were there difference in Americans responses to the Supreme Court decisions
Sedbober [7]

Answer:No

In Cooper v. Aaron (1958), the Supreme Court ruled that the state of Arkansas could not pass legislation undermining the Court's ruling in Brown v. Board of Education (1954) that racial segregation in public schools is unconstitutional.

Georgia, 31 U.S. 515 (1832), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee Nation was sovereign. According to the decision rendered by Chief Justice John Marshall, this meant that Georgia had no rights to enforce state laws in its territory.

Cherokee Nations v. Georgia, 30 U.S. (5 Pet.) 1 (1831), was a United States Supreme Court case. The Cherokee Nation sought a federal injunction against laws passed by the U.S. state of Georgia depriving them of rights within its boundaries, but the Supreme Court did not hear the case on its merits. It ruled that it had no original jurisdiction in the matter, as the Cherokees were a dependent nation, with a relationship to the United States like that of a "ward to its guardian," as said by Justice Marshall.

Explanation:

In June 1830, a delegation of Cherokee led by Chief John Ross (selected at the urging of Senators Daniel Webster and Theodore Frelinghuysen) and William Wirt, attorney general in the Monroe and Adams administrations, were selected to defend Cherokee rights before the U.S. Supreme Court. The Cherokee Nation asked for an injunction, claiming that Georgia's state legislation had created laws that "go directly to annihilate the Cherokees as a political society." Georgia pushed hard to bring evidence that the Cherokee Nation couldn't sue as a "foreign" nation due to the fact that they did not have a constitution or a strong central government. Wirt argued that "the Cherokee Nation [was] a foreign nation in the sense of our constitution and law" and was not subject to Georgia's jurisdiction. Wirt asked the Supreme Court to void all Georgia laws extended over Cherokee lands on the grounds that they violated the U.S. Constitution, United States-Cherokee treaties, and United States intercourse laws.

The Court did hear the case but declined to rule on the merits. The Court determined that the framers of the Constitution did not really consider the Indian Tribes as foreign nations but more as "domestic dependent nation[s]" and consequently the Cherokee Nation lacked the standing to sue as a "foreign" nation. Chief Justice Marshall said; "The court has bestowed its best attention on this question, and, after mature deliberation, the majority is of the opinion that an Indian tribe or nation within the United States is not a foreign state in the sense of the constitution, and cannot maintain an action in the courts of the United States." The Court held open the possibility that it yet might rule in favor of the Cherokee "in a proper case with proper parties".

Chief Justice John Marshall wrote that "the relationship of the tribes to the United States resembles that of a 'ward to its guardian'." Justice William Johnson added that the "rules of nations" would regard "Indian tribes" as "nothing more than wandering hordes, held together only by ties of blood and habit, and having neither rules nor government beyond what is required in a savage state."

Justice Smith Thompson, in a dissenting judgment joined by Justice Joseph Story, held that the Cherokee nation was a "foreign state" in the sense that the Cherokee retained their "usages and customs and self-government" and the United States government had treated them as "competent to make a treaty or contract". The Court therefore had jurisdiction; Acts passed by the State of Georgia were "repugnant to the treaties with the Cherokees" and directly in violation of a congressional Act of 1802; and the injury to the Cherokee was severe enough to justify an injunction against the further execution of the state laws.[

6 0
3 years ago
What medical field did Texans make huge contributions in right after WWII?
Salsk061 [2.6K]

Answer:

Orthopedics

Explanation:

hope this helped

stay safe

brainliest is appreciated only 1more to level up please help :)))

6 0
3 years ago
How did discoveries in science lead to a new way of thinking for europeans?
IgorLugansk [536]
Made their people question religion and if Science was biased towards it.
4 0
4 years ago
What rights were African American willing to fight for
hodyreva [135]

Answer:

Basic human rights, the right to vote and equal rights.

Explanation:

Because we needed them.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The first European colony to declare independence was a (n)_____colony
    13·1 answer
  • What was the Soviet union school in blocking land and water route to West Berlin
    15·1 answer
  • What role did religion play in the olmec and mayan culture?
    6·1 answer
  • Explain how World War 1 led to the rise of modernism
    15·2 answers
  • If a country has a low literacy, how would that effect a countries<br> economy/GDP?
    13·1 answer
  • In a Native American paradigm, humans are _____ the land. In a Western paradigm, humans are _____ the land.
    9·1 answer
  • Does the election process help to produce the best candidates?
    15·1 answer
  • What was the term the Germans used for the Holocaust?
    12·2 answers
  • What's more important: A leader who supports the<br> policies you want or Rule of Law?
    15·2 answers
  • How did Cortes conquer the Aztecs?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!