Answer:
Nuclear power
Explanation:
Even though it may cost a little more, it probably has the less effect on the environment. In times like these with climate change and the earth dying, it is important to do the best we can to reduce it. It has cons tho, nuclear power can be extremely dangerous if it goes wrong... Despite its safety measures, it's still pretty dangerous. Hope it helps!
Answer: Texas and California
Supporting points are:
Help the disadvantaged,support the underdeveloped nations humanitarian departments such as health and security,help integrate the people into the global economy, especially through educational initiative.It is in line with the moral majority, and christian doctrines of humanity.Can help eradicate human rights abuses as aid is tied to such demands
AgainstMost of the funds get into a few african elites hands anyway Redirecting tax payers money into other nation is morally wrong.It defeats the essence of rationality, as the country gets little benefit by giving out the aid.
Answer:
Use less electricity, ride bikes instead of cars, eat more vegetables, and use less factories that cause pollution
Explanation:
‘Climate’ is an old idea, but an idea which retains tremendous power, versatility and utility in today’s world. For the Ancient Greeks, climate worked both as index and as agency , and this dual function has recurred throughout human cultural history and it works too in contemporary discourses about climate change. Climates change physically, but climates can also change ideologically. What climate means to different people in different places in different eras is not stable. If culture is concerned with how human meaning, symbolism and practice take on substantive and material forms, then studying climate through culture is likely to be a fruitful activity.
