No one, not even he could have averted the war without a historical wrong that could no longer be justified in a democracy - the continuation of legal human bondage in the United States. But to answer the question. Yes, I think it was very possible that no guns had to fire, and it would have been to me a revolting development.
B. usually arbitrated the dispute.
This is due to horrible conditions for factory and migrant workers
The goal of England's mercantilist policy was to make the country richer.
In those days, people believed that mercantilism was the best way to do this. In the 1600s and 1700s (and even into the 1800s) most people believed in mercantilism.
Hope this helps! Please mark me brainliest!
What? What is the context
He created a trust that controlled 90% of the nation's oil refineries. If I remember correctly, horizontal integration is when you buy out the other businesses in the same market, while vertical integration is where you take control of everything related to your product, which is getting the oil, refining it, and distributing it, rather than selling those tasks out to third parties.
