Many employers fail to adequately socialize or orient their new hires to the organization because they are usually busy with and it takes lot of effort to do.
<h3>Who is an employer?</h3>
It should be noted that an employer simply means an individual who pulls resources together to achieve a goal. He's the owner of the business.
In this case, many employers fail to adequately socialize or orient their new hires to the organization because they are usually busy with and it takes lot of effort to do.
Learn more about employers on:
brainly.com/question/26463698
Answer:
its B don't listen to stupid people
Explanation:
Ray is a shareholder of a small company. When the director falls to undertake an action it falls under derivative suit.
Explanation:
- Derivative suit is referred to as a law suit that is brought by the shareholder in behalf of the company against the third party.
- If in a company the employees, the directors as well as the officers are not ready to file a complain against the third party then the shareholder has the right to file a complaint against the third party.
- Derivative suit is normally filed by the shareholder when there is a mismanagement in the company. To stop the illegal work this action is being taken.
Answer:
The broker is doing two different jobs; so it is okay to have two different licenses.
Explanation:
In this case, since the broker is doing two different jobs then it is okay for him to have two different licenses. In a hypothetical case that the individual Broker was doing the same job role for two different companies then that would be considered a form of conflict of interest and may cause problems with both firms in the future. Since this is not the case, then he should not have any problem.
Answer: C. The court concluded that Microsoft violated the Sherman Act
Explanation: The case between United States v. Microsoft Corporation which took place at the
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit during the period February 26–27, 2001 and was finally decided June 28, 2001.
It was decided by the District Court that Microsoft violated the Sharma Antitrust Act of 1890.
