Answer:
trade cook and a beer and some drinks and
The argument made by Holmes was that the protection of free speech is important but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.
<h3>What is the case of Schenck v. United States?</h3>
The Court determined that a state could constitutionally limit an individual's free speech rights under the First Amendment.
Hence, the Justice of the state made an argument that the the protection of free speech is important but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.
Therefore, the Option C is correct.
Read more about Schenck v. United States
<em>brainly.com/question/2764676</em>
#SPJ1
Well.. none now since they're dead... haha but when they were alive they were flightless and very clutsy birds, no wonder why they're extinct!
Hartford Convention I think
