1) the king could not tax the people without the agreement of Parliament
2)the king could not declare the martial law
3) the king could not broad soldiers in private homes during peacetime
4)the king could not imprison a person without a specific charge
I was confused but I think this is right sorry if its not
The general consensus amongst historians is that the balance between Federal and State powers was done to appease those who were afraid that too strong of a federal government would be no different than the monarchy that the colonists were overthrowing.
