Answer:
false
It is very common to compare Socrates with Jesus Christ insofar as they both act as "founding fathers" of Western culture. For two thousand years, each generation has built its own image of Socrates and Jesus; and Christianity has tended to see in Socrates a kind of cultural ancestor, who embodies the figure of the unjustly persecuted good man.
Traditionally they have been considered two martyrs of thought and miles of people in all times have been inspired by their moral example. Comparing is, however, a complex exercise because the Jewish world of the first century before our era had nothing to do with the world of the fifth century in which Socrates lived: the Greek cultural context was polytheistic and the Hebrew was monotheistic.
In Athens, and in classical Greek culture, there is no concept of "sin", which does exist in the Jewish world. Evil and guilt were not linked in Greece in the way they were in the Jewish tradition. Israel were also militarily occupied by the Romans, and although Athens did not live in its time of greatest expansion, in the time of Socrates It was a city that was hardly free and rich - or at least we could easily remember its time of splendor. Nor did the religious instances lose in Athens the power that the Temple of Jerusalem had at the time of Jesus.
In outline, and although we identify what to clarify, we can present a series of similarities and differences between Socrates and Jesus
Answer:
At first, Odysseus and his men refrain from eating the cattle because they all swore an oath not to eat any cattle. The situation changed when they were on the island because they were starving and trapped there for a month. Don't forget that it was Eurylochus who convinced the men to eat the Cattle of the Sun: "it's better to die at sea from the wrath of the gods, he said than to die of hunger."
I hope that helps! If you need more contextual evidence, it should be in the book.
Logos is appeal to reason or logic. It uses facts and evidence to convince a reader or listener of the strength of your argument.
Answer:
" i was like that ship before my education began, only i was without a compass or sounding-line, and had no way of knowing how near the harbor was."
Explanation: this could be confused for a metaphor being that metaphors and similes are like twins. What you need to remember is that a simile compares two unlike things using like or as. And a metaphor compares two unlike things without using the word like or as. therefore in this case because she uses "i was like" that is the line with the simile.
if my answer is correct so mark it as brainliest
A predicate nominative is a word that rephrases the subject.
<span>the subject is parade. </span>
<span>so symbol rephrases it.</span>
