Woodrow Wilson assumed the post of US President in 1912 with little experience in foreign affairs. He firmly resolved to build his foreign policy on moral principles, on selfish materialism, as his predecessors did. Moral diplomacy is a system in which support is given only to countries with the same moral principles. At the same time, this system should harm states whose principles are incompatible with moral principles, and such states are seen as enemies of America. Wilson hoped to increase the number of democratic countries, especially in Latin America. This attitude of Wilson on mild diplomacy and America's role in world politics comes from American exceptionalism, so he often intervened in the affairs of Mexico, Haiti, Cuba, Panama, the Dominican Republic. Because of this, he had international problems, especially in Mexico. This Latin American country has been known for its revolutions since 1910. The Americans, with their mining and other interests, demanded immediate intervention. When Victoriano Huerta assumed power in Mexico in 1913, Wilson refused to recognize him, although many world powers did so. Other countries supported Huerta because he was open to foreign investment. All this did not fit into Wilson's moral policy. In April 1914, following the capture of several American sailors by Huerta, Wilson used this to justify an order to the American Navy to take over the port city of Veracruz.
the answer to this question would be C because the english had founded the 13 original colonies
Answer: Napoleon impacted both Europe and the world in a number of ways. When thinking about Napoleon’s impact, we have to realize that he did not necessarily intend to have the impacts that he did. Instead, much of his impact came about inadvertently or even in response to his actions.
One of the biggest impacts that Napoleon had was that he caused a major backlash against his ideas and against the prospect that a single country...
Explanation:
Explanation:
The heavy sense of dictatorship and memories of the 1980s made Syrians think the wave of change in the region would never come to their country.
But it did happen. At first, people were surprised, but above all shocked that their government would fire on peaceful protesters in Deraa. Every day, the death toll increased and in reaction more people took to the street.
The movement started as protests calling for more freedom and dignity. The way the government handled the events since those first days drove more and more people to oppose President Bashar al-Assad.
At first, no-one was calling for the regime to fall. Many people had hopes that the young president would respond to their calls and punish those of the security forces who killed innocent civilians.
But the wave of killings and arrests, torture and humiliation targeting people who were not even involved in the demonstrations drove many who steered clear of politics to join the protest movement.
