The structural and rhetorical differences between paines and Henry's work is likely because

English

2 answers:

aleksley [76]3 years ago

5 0

Henry's was a speech and Paine's was in a pamphlet

cupoosta [38]3 years ago

4 0

The structural and rhetorical differences between Paine's and Henry's work is likely because both are coming from different geographical locations. Henry came from British area while Paine came from America. Paine tried to motivate and bring reality to America. He wrote a reminder how oppressive British crown is. Henry, on the other hand, used a similar base where England as the enemy.

You might be interested in

Read the excerpt from act 3, scene 1, of Julius Caesar. ANTONY. O pardon me, thou bleeding piece of earth, That I am meek and ge

zepelin [54]

Answer:

Antony wants Caesar to forgive him for being nice to his conspirators.

Antony predicts that the land will be bloodied by men fighting men.

Antony expects Caesar's ghost to seek retribution for the wrongs done.

Explanation:

In the excerpt from Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar," Antony stands next to Caesar's body and asks him for forgiveness for talking politely to his murderers: "O pardon me, thou bleeding piece of earth, That I am meek and gentle with these butchers!"

Then he foresees that a curse will fall, that there will be a terribly violent civil war, and that people will become evil and cruel:

"A curse shall light upon the limbs of men; Domestic fury and fierce civil strife Shall cumber all the parts of Italy; Blood and destruction shall be so in use, And dreadful objects so familiar, That mothers shall but smile when they behold Their infants quartered with the hands of war, All pity choked with custom of fell deeds (...)"

Finally, he refers to Caesar's ghost, who will come back for revenge:

"And Caesar’s spirit, ranging for revenge, With Ate by his side come hot from hell, Shall in these confines with a monarch’s voice Cry "Havoc!” and let slip the dogs of war (...)"

5 0

4 years ago

Please help, I'm in dire need at the moment, this is worth 20 Points

grin007 [14]

Answer :

A. Chekhov's use of the third-person limited point of view in "The Bet" allows him to describe the banker's self-contempt when the banker reads the lawyer's essay.

The banker had turned immoral after thinking about the consequences of the bet and intends to kill the lawyer to avoid paying him the money. The non-existent narrative voice in Chekhov's "The Bet" captivates the reader to delve into the mind of the banker and understand the feelings of self-contempt and disdain that he is experiencing upon reading the lawyer's essay.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How are novels and short stories different?

sdas [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Combine the word parts to create a properly spelled word. enjoy + ing =

oksano4ka [1.4K]

enjoying Hope this helps