Answer:
Appositive: the book by E.B. White
Noun or pronoun renamed: Charlotte's We
Explanation:
Appositive/appositive phrase is a noun/a noun phrase that remains another noun or a pronoun. There are two types of appositive phrases: restrictive (provides essential information about the noun it renames) and non-restrictive ( gives us more details about the renamed noun. Another important feature is that non-restrictive appositive phrases are always separated with commas from the rest of the sentence.
So, in this case, our appositive phrase is the book by E.B. White, and the noun it renames is Charlotte's Web. It is separated with commas and gives us more details about the renamed noun which makes it non-restrictive appositive phrase.
Explanation:
go on wattpad and put in what you need (literature poems)
Answer:
The short story, “Sleeping” by Katharine Weber, has an appropriate title because it applies to the characters in different ways; one can see this through the symbolism of Mr. and Mrs. Winters’ last name, Charles (the sleeping baby), and Harriet’s inexperience and ignorance.
Explanation:
The only option that contains a semicolon is the second one. The semicolon is a punctuation mark used to connect two independent clauses that are closely related in thought. This is the cause in the given sentence.
In the third and fourth sentences, these two clauses are connected only by a comma, which makes them grammatically incorrect. This type of mistake is called a comma splice. It can be corrected by adding a conjunction or changing the comma into a semicolon.
The first sentence is the second-best one. There is no semicolon here, but it would be grammatically correct to put a period between these clauses. However, a comma after the word <em>story </em>is omitted, and another one is misplaced - there shouldn't be a comma after the world <em>Charles</em>, but there should be one after the parentheses.
This is why the second option is the correct one.
Depends on the event but usually it changes the individuals perspective on things
Answer:
"If the Inca king could not conquer the Titicaca lords who owned these vast herds, he could never be safe."
Explanation:
This question is about the article "Lofty Ambitions of the Inca" where the authors explore the history of the Incas, the region they dominated, the people they conquered and the activities they carried out. One of the sections of the article features the title "The Colla Are Kicked Out" where it shows that the Collas were the dominators of Titicaca, which was a land full of riches and with large herds of islands and alpacas that are extremely strong animals and that can be used in several ways. The titicaca gave the Collas a lot of power and that undermined the security and influence of the Incas, which caused King Inca to decide to dominate the Titicaca. We can see this in the article through the line:
"If the Inca king could not conquer the Titicaca lords who owned these vast herds, he could never be safe."
