Answer:
2.5 km = 250000 cm
500 ft = 15240 cm
Explanation:
part a
given data
length = 2.5 km
to find out
Convert into cm
solution
we know that 1 m = 100 cm ...............1
and also we know 1 km = 1000 m .................2
sop as that we can say from equation 1 and 2
1 km = 100000 cm
so for 2.5 km = 2.5 × 100000 cm
2.5 km = 250000 cm
and
part b
given data
length = 500 ft
to find out
Convert ft into cm
solution
we know here that
1 ft = 12 inches ..................1
and also we know 1 inch = 2.54 cm ...................2
so we can say
500 ft = 12 × 500 inches
500 ft = 6000 inches
and 500 ft = 6000 × 2.54 cm
500 ft = 15240 cm
Explanation:
A major problem with using 15 years of data to predict 100 years of data is that the 15 years could have been setting a trend, then level off.
For example, if the 15 years of data was a graph, and it was going up every year, then what if 20 years into the 100 years it stops going up? Then that means the data was invalid because there wasn't enough to base any trends off of.
You can prevent this from happening by extending the collection time of data and to reduce the amount of time that the data will be used to predict.
Hope this helps!
This is true because 6 and 15’s sum is 21.
I would say that probably classifying natural disasters and their impact on man would most likely be considered by William Hughes as true geography as rather than just describing earth's features it would show the impact of earth's processes on man.
