Answer:
first as a mixture of indentured slavery, African chattel slavery, and native American slavery for economic gain in the Southern colonies.
Explanation:
The Southern colonies, including in the West Indies, had mainly focused on the production of cash crops and plantation agriculture. However, this took a lot of labor, including in dangerous working environments. Indentured servants, often times immigrants from Ireland, were a risky investment, and often died. New diseases from the old world killed off much of the native American population, not to mention they knew the land and had places to escape from slavery to. African chattel slavery had two main benefits: 1) they came from Africa in large quantities (with much immunity due to the longer history of European interaction) and typically had no where to go, making them available, and 2) their children were also born into slavery, meaning there were essentially, in the eyes of masters, and endless "supply" of slaves. Even after new slave importation from Africa was banned, the children of slaves remained and continued on. This economic benefit that slaves carried continued far after the American Revolution in the south, especially after the creation of the cotton gin during the market revolution, as well as western expansion, that made slavery even more practical than it had previously been.
He launched the Great Leap Forward in 1958 following the first Five Year Plan that ended in 1957.
The Great Leap Forward was to push the economic growth of the China, by focusing on building its industry. The government demanded every civilians to collect as much steel as they could for the industry, which they turned out to furnace everything they've got. As the materials are nit utilized, the steel product cannot be used and became a waste of material.
People's commune is also set up for industrial development, which in the end caused the lower of farming products and the lack of food.
In this plan, about 41 million died from famine and by no means does it promote economic development thus is a failure.
Hope it helps!
Answer:
Elisha Graves Otis developed a safe elevator.
JFK meant that instead of expecting change to your country what can you do to change it. <span>Kennedy's inaugural was as much a challenge to America's youth as it was a speech.</span>
