The term best described this movement is emigration or migration whether legal or not. In these years, a lot of Ecuadorians not only teachers but a lot of skilled workers and educated people have migrate to Europe especially Spain because this is the time when Spain to enter the country as visitors or tourists without visas. This is caused because of financial and economic crisis the country experience that cause rise of unemployed and the fall of its currency, the Sucre.
Explanation:
In simpler words, the multi-part question is asking for you to first analyze the three sources, then pick a side and have knowledge to defend your point on the question 'to what extent should nations pursue their national interests'.
In source 1, it shows that the majority of Canadians are opposed to sending troops to Afghanistan, with 36% voting for, 5% unsure, and 59% voting against.
Source two is clearly depicting the nazi's, at a rally held in Nuremberg. Although the source does not state if the protesters are pro or against Nazi regime, I am assuming they are pro. This would lead to the assumption that the people of Nuremberg are pro-Nazi empire.
The source 3 is a timeline, that goes from 1920 to 2005. This time period is very significant, because it captures many important battles, such as world war 2, Persian Gulf War, and the Iraq invasion.
After reading these three sources, you must decide if you think it is good for nations to pursue their national interests, or bad.
Hope this long explanation helped clarify the troubling question for you!
The act ignored the traditional Native American views of land ownership. Hope this helps!
It has outsourced many high risk jobs to countries that do not protect workers.
Hope this helped, sorry if not.
