1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bonufazy [111]
3 years ago
12

Now that you've had a little practice analyzing the structure of argumentative texts, let's return to "In Praise of Slacking." W

hat structural elements are missing from the text? Write one possible counterargument opposing the author's claim that doing less is an ideal we should embrace. Then, explain why you do or do not find your counterargument compelling
English
1 answer:
monitta3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Refer below.

Explanation:

The creator does exclude an area investigating counterarguments or an end.

In spite of the fact that there are numerous outstanding instances of fruitful journalists who were known—in any event to a limited extent—for their lethargy, instances of individuals who were effective as an immediate consequence of their tirelessness possess large amounts of a wide scope of controls. Michael Jordan, for instance, is broadly viewed as one of the best ball players ever. During his profession, he was known for his tenacious seriousness and scrupulousness. Among writers, Ray Bradbury was known for keeping in touch with one short story consistently—a shocking pace of creation. What's more, numerous other fruitful creators have set page amounts and severe timetables for themselves. Along these lines, while downgrading profitability may have worked for a few, concentrating eagerly on it has worked for some others.

I discover my counterargument genuinely compelling. The creator's contention fundamentally comprises of narrative proof. It would be compelling if the entirety of the accessible proof bolstered the focal case. However, the measure of narrative proof that doesn't bolster the case debilitates the creator's contention and reinforces my counterarguement.

You might be interested in
What is the first step to taking to help reduce pollution
svp [43]

The first step in reducing pollution is to acknowledge that there is pollution.

Without this step, we wouldn't even need to see pollution as a threat unless we <em>acknowledge</em> that it exists first.

~

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which sentence is not relevant to the paragraph and should be deleted?
denis-greek [22]

Answer:

Option D

Explanation:

The reason is option D or "music has been proven to calm animals and to make humans smarter." That is because the entire paragraph was about the science to why humans enjoy music so much. Earlier sentences suggested MRI scans, monitoring brain activity, and people being willing to spend more on music based on their brain activity. The final sentence was information about how music calms animals when the entire paragraph was about the science to why humans enjoy music which is why that is your answer.

Hope this helps.

7 0
2 years ago
Susan solved 200-91 and decided o add her answer to 91 to check her work. Explain why this strategy works
Elanso [62]
Think of an equation:

200 - 91 = 109

You can do anything to this equation, as long as you do the same thing to both sides. So, if you add 91 to both sides, you will get:

200 = 200

Since this holds true, Susan's strategy to add her answer to 91 makes sense. 
7 0
3 years ago
Which personal pronoun correctly completes the sentence? The funniest performers were Karl, Mike, and __________. A. my B. me C.
Deffense [45]
The correct personal pronoun to complete the sentence is the subject pronoun, C. I: "The funniest performers were Karl, Mike, and I.
            
The compound object "Karl, Mike, and I" is a subject complement.

A subject complement is a noun, a noun phrase, a pronoun, or an adjective that follows a linking verb to restate the subject of the sentence.
A linking verb acts as an equal sign, the subject is or becomes the object.
> performers = Karl, Mike, and I
A noun or a pronoun subject complement is called a predicate nominative.


A pronoun that functions as a subject complement (a predicate nominative) is always the subjective form.
3 0
3 years ago
Please help me with a letter <br><br>to your regular grocer apologizing for the late payment.​
Pachacha [2.7K]

Answer:

Dear {Mr./Mrs. Name}, I am sincerely sorry for the delay in payment on {loan type}. I apologize for any inconvenience or frustration this caused you. ... I would appreciate it if, considering the circumstances and the fact that this is my first infraction, you would be willing to waive the late payment fee.

sincerly,(you name)

Explanation:

why are you apologizing to the grocery people in the first place?(Just curious)

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Contoh describing people
    11·1 answer
  • An example of this phase is: After class, Jean makes a comment about the teacher to Paula. If Paula responds with her impression
    7·1 answer
  • .
    8·2 answers
  • PART B: Which detail from the text best supports the answer to Part A?
    13·2 answers
  • How did Theodore Roosevelt give people hope?
    12·1 answer
  • Who's state test is this tuesday
    8·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP! WILL MARK THE BRAINLIEST! HELP*
    15·1 answer
  • Asap need now
    10·2 answers
  • Drag each tile to the correct location.
    8·1 answer
  • 4. What do the others do when they see Bottom? *
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!