1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
denpristay [2]
2 years ago
14

How do consumers benefit from competition in the market place

History
1 answer:
Zina [86]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

it benefits consumers by keeping prices low and the quality and choice of goods and services high. Competition makes our economy work. By enforcing antitrust laws, the Federal trade Commission helps to ensure that our markets are open and free. ... the FtC does not choose winners and losers – you, as the consumer, do that.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How is the President honoring his commitment to the American people by pausing
Katena32 [7]

<em>Our President is hiding in a bunker in fear of the American people demanding a change. </em>

<em>That alone tells you how much of a terrible job he's doing. </em>

<em>If I could give him advice to do something different, it would be to listen to what the people are saying. Not call us "theives" nor "thugs", but instead see us as human beings. </em>

<em>Everyone should go back to work regardless of their desent. Everyone deserves a chance </em>

4 0
3 years ago
In which order did this sequence of events from Texas history occur?
vaieri [72.5K]
The answer is C. Chronologically, Settlement, Revolution, Victory and Establishment of a Republic, then Statehood.
8 0
3 years ago
What is not an example of total war?
allochka39001 [22]

Answer:

D. Governments created camps to house refugees.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Explain MacMillan's conclusion that Wilson "remained a Southerner in some ways all his life." Describe how Wilson's background a
Murljashka [212]

Answer:

paki basa nalng .

Explanation:

On December 4, 1918, the George Washington sailed out of New York with the American delegation to the Peace Conference on board. Guns fired salutes, crowds along the waterfront cheered, tugboats hooted and Army planes and dirigibles circled overhead. Robert Lansing, the American secretary of state, released carrier pigeons with messages to his relatives about his deep hope for a lasting peace. The ship, a former German passenger liner, slid out past the Statue of Liberty to the Atlantic, where an escort of destroyers and battleships stood by to accompany it and its cargo of heavy expectations to Europe.

On board were the best available experts, combed out of the universities and the government; crates of reference materials and special studies; the French and Italian ambassadors to the United States; and Woodrow Wilson. No other American president had ever gone to Europe while in office. His opponents accused him of breaking the Constitution; even his supporters felt he might be unwise. Would he lose his great moral authority by getting down to the hurly-burly of negotiations? Wilson's own view was clear: the making of the peace was as important as the winning of the war. He owed it to the peoples of Europe, who were crying out for a better world. He owed it to the American servicemen. "It is now my duty," he told a pensive Congress just before he left, "to play my full part in making good what they gave their life's blood to obtain." A British diplomat was more cynical; Wilson, he said, was drawn to Paris "as a debutante is entranced by the prospect of her first ball."

Wilson expected, he wrote to his great friend Edward House, who was already in Europe, that he would stay only to arrange the main outlines of the peace settlements. It was not likely that he would remain for the formal Peace Conference with the enemy. He was wrong. The preliminary conference turned, without anyone's intending it, into the final one, and Wilson stayed for most of the crucial six months between January and June 1919. The question of whether or not he should have gone to Paris, which exercised so many of his contemporaries, now seems unimportant. From Franklin Roosevelt at Yalta to Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton at Camp David, American presidents have sat down to draw borders and hammer out peace agreements. Wilson had set the conditions for the armistices which ended the Great War. Why should he not make the peace as well?

Although he had not started out in 1912 as a foreign policy president, circumstances and his own progressive political principles had drawn him outward. Like many of his compatriots, he had come to see the Great War as a struggle between the forces of democracy, however imperfectly represented by Britain and France, and those of reaction and militarism, represented all too well by Germany and Austria-Hungary. Germany's sack of Belgium, its unrestricted submarine warfare and its audacity in attempting to entice Mexico into waging war on the United States had pushed Wilson and American public opinion toward the Allies. When Russia had a democratic revolution in February 1917, one of the last reservations that the Allies included an autocracy vanished. Although he had campaigned in 1916 on a platform of keeping the country neutral, Wilson brought the United States into the war in April 1917. He was convinced that he was doing the right thing. This was important to the son of a Presbyterian minister, who shared his father's deep religious conviction, if not his calling.

Wilson was born in Virginia in 1856, just before the Civil War. Although he remained a Southerner in some ways all his life in his insistence on honor and his paternalistic attitudes toward women and blacks he also accepted the war's outcome. Abraham Lincoln was one of his great heroes, along with Edmund Burke and William Gladstone. The young Wilson was at once highly idealistic and intensely ambitious. After four very happy years at Princeton and an unhappy stint as a lawyer, he found his first career in teaching and writing. By 1890 he was back at Princeton, a star member of the faculty. In 1902 he became its president, supported virtually unanimously by the trustees, faculty and students.

6 0
2 years ago
How were ancient Native American leaders similar to ancient Mesoamerican leaders?
dolphi86 [110]

Answer:Leaders of both cultures controlled the local economy.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which was part of Reagan’s political agenda as he campaigned for the presidency in 1980?
    9·2 answers
  • Hitler wanted to annex the Sudetenland to gain access to Czechoslovakia. Please select the best answer from the choices provided
    12·1 answer
  • The _______________________ enacted reforms such as creation of Jesuits, education of priests, and stop selling indulgences.
    5·1 answer
  • What was equianos purpose for writing this chapter of his narrative
    6·2 answers
  • What push/pull factors led to exploration during the Age of Discovery?
    13·1 answer
  • What effect would an increase in a state's sales tax have on public education within the state?
    14·1 answer
  • Match the country with the correct description of a practice used toward slaves.
    15·2 answers
  • How did the U.S. government's approach to the military during the Great Depression differ from that of Germany's Nazi government
    8·1 answer
  • What were the two sides fighting over in the french and indian war?
    13·1 answer
  • What is the Features of Force theory ​
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!