What is the difference and similarities of Mexica and the Incas?

2 answers:

6 0

Answer:The Inca and Aztec empires were very similar. They were based on managing resources and goods, and the economy was centered around their agriculture. The Incas and the Aztecs were orgianlly clan based but they grew into thriving empires. Both civilizations were also based off of earlier civilizations before The Inca and Aztec empires were very similar. They were based on managing resources and goods, and the economy was centered around their agriculture. The Incas and the Aztecs were orgianlly clan based but they grew into thriving empires. Both civilizations were also based off of earlier civilizations before them Both the Aztecs and the Spaniards were expansionist and imperialist peoples, but the Aztecs used a tribute system while the Spaniards used colonialism. The Aztecs conquered the city-states surrounding Tenochtitlan and their own city-states and demanded tribute and persons to use as human sacrifices. hope this helps have a nice night❤️❤️❤️

Explanation:

Wittaler [7]2 years ago

4 0

The Inca and Aztec empires were very similar. They were based on managing resources and goods, and the economy was centered around their agriculture. The Incas and the Aztecs were orgianlly clan based but they grew into thriving empires. Both civilizations were also based off of earlier civilizations before

You might be interested in

How did the concept of mutually assured destruction influence the Cold War?

Citrus2011 [14]

It reminded people that a nuclear war would be devastating for everyone.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A system of government in which rule is by the people is called

german

Answer: Democracy

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Which of the following was one of four main causes of World War I?AalliancesBpropagandaCWorld War IIDthe Treaty of Versailles

Snowcat [4.5K]

Answer:

Treaty of Versailles

6 0

3 years ago

Explain why westward expansion created a clash between sectional interests in Missouri

professor190 [17]

I believe that the answer to the question provided above is that the <span>westward expansion created a clash between sectional interests in Missouri because of the geographical location of Missouri it was being clashed.</span>
Hope my answer would be a great help for you. If you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.

4 0

3 years ago

Northerners_____ counting slaves as part of the population if they had no rights, while southerners _____ counting slaves. Accor

polet [3.4K]

Answer:

Northerners opposed counting slaves as part of the population if they had no rights, while southerners supported counting slaves. According to the compromise, five slaves would count as three free persons when calculating how many representatives each state received in the House of Representatives.

Explanation:

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise established during the 1787 Philadelphia Convention between the colonies of the North and the South. This compromise considered, in the rules for counting people represented in the House of Representatives, that a slave was counted up to three fifths of a free man.

The question was important, as the population count would then be used to determine the number of seats each state would have in the US House of Representatives. The Compromise gave a disproportionate representation of the slave states in the House of Representatives compared to the voters in the free states until the Civil War.

6 0

3 years ago