1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alona [7]
3 years ago
7

In Rome, who chose the city officials and why?

History
1 answer:
katovenus [111]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

he Roman magistrates were elected officials in Ancient Rome.

During the period of the Roman Kingdom, the King of Rome was the principal executive magistrate.[1] His power, in practice, was absolute. He was the chief priest, lawgiver, judge, and the sole commander of the army.[1][2] When the king died, his power reverted to the Roman Senate, which then chose an Interrex to facilitate the election of a new king.

During the transition from monarchy to republic, the constitutional balance of power shifted from the executive (the Roman king) to the Roman Senate. When the Roman Republic was founded in 509 BC, the powers that had been held by the king were transferred to the Roman consuls, of which two were to be elected each year. Magistrates of the republic were elected by the people of Rome, and were each vested with a degree of power called "major powers" ().[3] Dictators had more "major powers" than any other magistrate, and after the Dictator was the censor, and then the consul, and then the praetor, and then the curule aedile, and then the quaestor. Any magistrate could obstruct ("veto") an action that was being taken by a magistrate with an equal or lower degree of magisterial powers.[4] By definition, plebeian tribunes and plebeian aediles were technically not magistrates[5] since they were elected only by the plebeians,[3] and as such, they were independent of all other powerful magistrates[].

During the transition from republic to the Roman empire, the constitutional balance of power shifted from the Roman Senate back to the executive (the Roman Emperor). Theoretically, the senate elected each new emperor; in practice each emperor chose his own successor, though the choice was often overruled by the army or civil war. The powers of an emperor (his ) existed, in theory at least, by virtue of his legal standing. The two most significant components to an emperor's  were the "tribunician powers" and the "proconsular powers".[6] In theory at least, the tribunician powers (which were similar to those of the plebeian tribunes under the old republic) gave the emperor authority over Rome's civil government, while the proconsular powers (similar to those of military governors, or proconsuls, under the old republic) gave him authority over the Roman army. While these distinctions were clearly defined during the early empire, eventually they were lost, and the emperor's powers became less constitutional and more monarchical.[7] The traditional magistracies that survived the fall of the republic were the consulship, praetorship, plebeian tribunate, aedileship, quaestorship, and military tribunate.[8] Mark Antony abolished the offices of dictator and Master of the Horse during his Consulship in 44 BC, while the offices of Interrex and Roman censor were abolished shortly thereafter.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What policy did the Songhai empire adopt to govern their diverse empire of mostly non-Muslims? How did this policy allow the Son
sweet-ann [11.9K]

They developed a policy of religious freedom so all subjects were content, though Islam remained the dominant religion in the government.

6 0
3 years ago
Arrange the probable events of the development of Hinduism in the croorect order​
GaryK [48]

Answer:

no options man

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Why did the fighting between Patriots and Loyalists in the South turn vicious?​
Fantom [35]

Answer:

because both sides used the war as an excuse to attack and plunder their neighboring homesteads

Explanation:

have a great day ahead :)

8 0
2 years ago
What is the radical republicans goals?
Georgia [21]

Answer:

The Radical Republicans believed blacks were entitled to the same political rights and opportunities as whites. They also believed that the Confederate leaders should be punished for their roles in the Civil War.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the followine was not true regarding the reaty or Versailles?
pav-90 [236]
I believe the answer is A the United States may have not liked that they were blaming it all on Germany how ever we still agreed because we had also want something out of the deal and signing the treaty allowed it
6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What might explain why the Dutch believed that they had more of a claim on New Amsterdam than the British?
    5·1 answer
  • What law would you would enact, and how this helps society?
    5·1 answer
  • Geographic Context definition
    9·1 answer
  • I need help is it A,BC or D
    15·2 answers
  • How we're the articles of confederation weak?
    11·2 answers
  • How do you think we can and should hold President Biden and Vice President Harris accountable?
    13·2 answers
  • What was the cause of the holocaust happen and explain the political, cultural, economic reasons why as well because I am curiou
    8·2 answers
  • Among division 1 college football teams, what is the most common mascot?
    8·1 answer
  • This Spanish explorer went on an expedition to Mexico, conquered the Aztecs and gained access to their gold and territory. (juan
    10·1 answer
  • How does Congress lowering the tax rate increase consumer spending?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!