All categories

2 years ago

Need help ASAP plz !!!!!

Mathematics

1 answer:

Flura [38]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

chint chong your opinion is wrong 69

Step-by-step explanation:

69 420 give brainliest

You might be interested in

$12 for 6 bagels; $9 for 24 bagels.

BabaBlast [244]

Answer:

What is the question that you are asking?

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

A bag of pecans costs $3.84. If

Stels [109]

Answer:

10.4 cents

Step-by-step explanation:

40 pecans/$3.84 gives you pecans per dollar

6 0

3 years ago

HELPPP A GIRL OUT pleaseeee

spayn [35]

Answer:

i think is b sorry if im wrong

3 0

3 years ago

Are the two triangles shown below similar? yes or no. explain

IgorLugansk [536]

Answer:

Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the triangles have two congruent angles, the third angle is also congruent.

The sides of one triangle are proportional to the corresponding sides of the other triangle.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

MARSVECTORCALC6 3.4.020. My Notes A rectangular box with no top is to have a surface area of 64 m2. Find the dimensions (in m) t

ioda

Answer:

We would have

$l =w =\frac{8\sqrt{3}}{3} \\h = \frac{8\sqrt{3}}{6}$

where " l " is length, " w" is width and "h" is height.

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1

Remember that

Surface area for a box with no top = $lw+2lh+2wh = 64$

where " l " is length, " w" is width and "h" is height.

Step 2.

Remember as well that

Volume of the box = $l*w*h$

Step 3

We can now use lagrange multipliers. Lets say,

$F(l,w,h) = lwh$

and

$g(l,w,h) = lw+2lh+2wh = 64$

By the lagrange multipliers method we know that

$\nabla F = \lambda \nabla g$

Step 4

Remember that

$\nabla F = (wh,lh,lw)$

and

$\nabla g = (w+2h,l+2h , 2w+2l)$

So basically you will have the system of equations

$wh = \lambda (w+2h)\\lh = \lambda (l+2h)\\lw = \lambda (2w+2l)$

Now, remember that you can multiply the first eqation, by "l" the second equation by "w" and the third one by "h" and you would get

$lwh = l\lambda (w+2h)\\\\lwh = w\lambda (l+2h)\\\\lwh = h\lambda (2w+2l)$

Then you would get

$l\lambda (w+2h) = w\lambda (l+2h) = h\lambda (2w+2l)$

You can get rid of $\lambda$ from these equations and you would get

$lw+2lh = lw+2wh = 2wh+2lh$

And from those equations you would get

$l = w =2h$

Now remember the original equation

$lw+2lh+2wh = 64$

If we plug in what we just got, we would have

$l^{2} + l^{2} + l^2 = 64 \\3l^{2} = 64 \\l = w = \frac{8\sqrt{3} }{3} \\h = \frac{8\sqrt{3} }{6}$

7 0

3 years ago