Answer:
the answer is bushy
Explanation:
the answer is that because you said it
The answer is, To argue for, there's the obvious, which is that the colonists didn't
like their lack of voice within British Parliament. They also didn't
like how Britain was treating other colonies, what would become Canada
for instance, with similar laws and codes seen in the US colonies. You
could also argue that it was a more financial decision, as the taxes
placed upon the colonies and the restrictions on trade were hurting
American businesses. Honestly, an argument combining the two would
probably be more rounded.
Court cases cost too much time and money.
Answer:
A divided regional identity (with a bit of national unity) developed.
Explanation:
Politics: Some contributed (voting rights) to unity, others (nullification) clearly divided the country.
Economics: Market revolution was a bit of both but Tariffs and the clash between the industrial north and the agricultural south was dividing the country and contributed to a regional identity.
Foreign Policy: The war of 1812 united the country; the westward expansion was uniting and dividing at the same time.
As we take in account that Economics is always the most important thing for the general public, the regional identity grew more than the national unity did.
Hi there!
During the renaissance, many believe who read the ancient texts and informed themselves began accusing the Catholic church that it wasn't very attentive about people and that it was assertive, always searching for ways to assemble affluence and more potential. These ancient texts came from many origins such as Plato and Aristotle from the western hemisphere, or as far away as india.
<u>I hope this helped</u>
<em>-WolfieWolfFromSkech</em>
