Answer:
Connective.
Explanation:
'Connective', as the name suggests are demonstrated as the words that primarily intend or function to join two words, clauses, phrases, or sentences. These words are quite similar to conjunction or a relative pronoun and function to add the connectivity among the ideas by presenting the relation between them by offering the reason, consequence, contradiction, etc. It also helps in maintaining the smooth flow of ideas in a logical and coherent manner. Some examples would include: besides, finally, further, hence, afterward, as soon as, etc.
Option D. He wants to arrive on time.
It is the only option that has subject and predicate.
What happens with the other options.
A) There is no predicate, so you do not know what happen with the Four baby dogs wadding down the path.
B) There is no subject. Who walked the dog?
C) The funniest part of the comedy show ... clearly is also incomplete, you do not know even if this is a subject or a predicate, depends on what you wanted to say.
It depends on how they stare. For example, they get excited when they see you, and move their tails, also moving their tails can mean either they are happy or scared
Because this is a subject of verb tenses, we focus on the verbs used in the given sentence. That would be 'takes'. To know which verb tense this is, let us examine each of the choices.
Present: Present tense verbs are expressed in their basic forms such as help, take, give, type, etc.
Present emphatic: This verb tense is used to give emphasis. It's hint word is the word 'does'. For example: She does take her dog to walk first thing in the morning.
Present progressive: This is written as 'is' + 'verb-ing' or 'are' + 'verb-ing'. For example: She is taking her dog for a walk.
Present perfect: This is written as 'has' or 'have' + past participle of the verb. For example: She has taken the dog for a walk.
So, from the descriptions, the sentence must be in simple present tense.
Answer:
I think he´s (partly) right
Explanation:
Partly right because yes, colleges are flooded with individuals who seem to be out of place and not learning anything that they could have learned outside the school building. Murray´s essay follows quite clearly the opinion of Noam Chomsky. The strategical creation of a separated American class system is a daring theory that needs some (personal) coments because of its elitist element, i.e. we who study have (keep) the power.
Two examples:
México is a democracy in name where the powerful and rich people send their kids - no matter how stupid they are - to college schools and private universities that only exist as the entry door to a well-paid job. And even if you don´t go to university you can always buy your degree, as former president Fox did.
Germany is a real democracy that has a social education system. It is costly but the economic support (bafug in German) for students is based on how much your parents earn. If your parents are poor you get more money per month to study and vice versa.
Now kindly look at the American educational system and see if it resembles more the Mexican or the German system.
