Answer:
leaderless group discussion
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described it can be said that the type of term for this type of development exercise is a leaderless group discussion or LGD for short. This exercise focuses on placing individuals in a group in order to work together on solving specific problems without help from a trained professional or expert in the matters that they are dealing with.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be Option C.
Explanation:
- The strategy execution method offers a systematic framework to explain, interact, enforce, and conduct policy. The objective of this project would be to ensure that the organization focuses on building value-added technologies and implementing value-optimizing expenditures.
- Bringing together a good leadership people with the highest combination of talents, abilities, as well as the desire to do tasks has become one of the measures to follow to initiate this venture.
Other choices have no relation with the specified scenario. So Option C seems to be the right response.
The formula is
I=prt
I interest due ?
P principle 3500
R interest rate 0.05
T time 1 year
I=3,500×0.05×1
I=175
Answer:
US specialisation in TV can be stated on the basis of Absolute Advantage, not comparative advantage.
Explanation:
Absolute Advantage is when a country can produce more output per input of a commodity, than other country.
Comparative Advantage is when a country can produce a good at lower opportunity cost (in terms of other sacrifised)
China can produce more (ie 5 units television) per hour employed, compared to US able to produce lesser (3 units) in the same time. So, on the basis of Absolute Advantage, it can be stated that US should specialise in TV production.
However, since other good's details have not been given. So, we cannot attain the relative opportunity costs. Hence, specialisation on the basis of comparative advantage can't be stated.
