In Federalist No. 78, Hamilton said that the Judiciary branch of the proposed government would be the weakest of the three branches because it had "no influence over either the sword or the purse, ...It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment." Federalist No. 78 quotes Montesquieu<span>: "Of the three powers [...], the judiciary is next to nothing." There was little concern that the judiciary might be able to overpower the political branches; since Congress controlled the flow of money and the President the military, courts did not have nearly the same clout from a constitutional design standpoint. </span>
Answer:
a revolution is basically a complete change with society, government, etc.
Explanation:
(the last question is your own opinion so I can't really answer that for you :))
The history of the American Revolution does not prove that owning small firearms is a means for citizens to defend themselves.
<h3 /><h3>Does the American Revolution support the Second Amendment?</h3>
Proponents of the Second Amendment had the notion that if civilians had small firearms, they would be able to defend themselves against tyrannical governments.
Yet this was not the case in the American Revolution because the people could not rely on small firearms to defend themselves against the British.
They had to rely on heavy artillery and arms which was what the British had as well.
Find out more on the Second Amendment at brainly.com/question/1750552.
#SPJ1
Answer:
The right answer is "A panic ensued and people began to sell their stocks, causing prices to dive."
Explanation:
The margin calls made by brokers cause a mini-crash of the market on March 25, 1929. Prices plummeted. There was a temporary solution when some prominent bankers promised they would continue to lend, assuaging investors´concerns.
It made the Himalayas my bro
