The distribution shows that 91% which is pretty much the very high-end were earning below $1,200 a year which means they were turning that much and we can infer that in the 18th there were people with a very poor background and technology want advance at that time and outcome of that would be people would be very poor and in this
It also showed that there were only 9% of people who are earning above $1,200 and this shows that not many people would have earned that but due to the background the amount of job opportunity the wages the seller which which all contribute and in this scenario
There are four option but the correct answer would be A as it also shows that not many people that much then having a poor background is a very good explanation to put this through. you you also tells that only a minority and above $1,200
So the correct answer is A
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Estos serían los tres objetivos de la investigación de campo para una empresa comercializadora de ropa indígena.
1.- Conocer la cantidad de consumidores que conocen las características de las telas e hilos con los que se elabora la ropa indígena.
2.- Conocer el número de consumidores que están enterados en la ropa elaborada por indígenas.
3.- Saber el rango de precios que estarían dispuestos a pagar los consumidores por este tipo de prendas de vestir, una vez que conozcan la calidad de los materiales y el trabajo artesanal para fabricarlos.
Estos serían los objetivos centrales de la investigación de campo. Obteniendo las respuestas de estos planteamientos, la empresa tendrá la información importante para poder tomar la mejor decisión para promocionar y comercializar sus productos en diferentes segmentos.
One thing <span>that Abraham Maslow's and Carl Rogers's theories have in common is </span>they believe that each human being is free to choose his or her own destiny.
Hope this helps!
They knew hit and run attacks called guerrilla warfare
