<u>The statement is completely true. </u>Even though many records of the pre-colonial period haven been lost, Latin America literature has given great works in a short period of time.
We can see their vigour in the literature about their culture, tradition and history. It is necessary to mention Ricardo Palma with his <em>tradiciones peruanas</em>, Domingo Sarmiento <em>Facundo </em>(shows the dichotomy between civilization and barbarism). This wave of Romanticism brings another great work and that is <em>Martín Fierro </em>(José Hernández), representing the authentic Argentine tradition and culture.
Latin America literature has shown its vigour in many revolutionary minds. We first think of José Martí (Cuba) and his revolutionary ideas and poetry. Another great fruit of Latin America literature was the creation of the literary movement called <em>Modernismo</em>. It began with Rubén Darío and his book <em>Azul</em>. This is the first literary movement originating from this continent.
After that, Latin American authors have been producing original works and movements. Latin American Boom is well-known all over the world (it includes writers such as Jorge Luis Borges, Julio Cortázar, Gabriel García Márquez, etc.). A very close movement that arises in the same literary surrounding is magic realism. This great invention has brought a literature revolution that influenced authors worldwide.
The correct answer is D) The lines from "Harlem" and the lines from "The Weary Blues" both provide details using the sense of sight.
The other options of the question were A) The lines from "Harlem" provide sensory details, and the lines from "The Weary Blues" do not. B) The lines from "Harlem" and the lines from "The Weary Blues" both provide details through personification. C) The lines from "Harlem" provide details using the sense of sight, and the lines from "The Weary Blues" provide details using the sense of touch.
The statement that best describes the relationship between these lines is
the lines from "Harlem" and the lines from "The Weary Blues" both provide details using the sense of sight.
When an author uses sensory elements, it wants the reader to "feel, sense, see, or taste" what the author is writing. This is a good way to describe some action, place, moment or situation so the reader can "transport" to that moment of the story. That is the case of the lines of "Harlem" and "The Weary Blues."
I like the answer the best president. He did accomplish a lot and that makes him a very successful president but there really isn't a right answer. It's an opinion which most likely many will agree with. But you don't have to write "in my opinion" over and over. It's better not to repeat.
I personally would say ancient castle in ruins...
My reason for this would be that the office building and the apartment in the city will be modern and won't have a Gothic feel to it...
The mansion in the countryside will be surrounded by green fields and well that scenario doesn't sound very dark and Gothic to me...
And well that castle in ruins will have a spooky side to it as it will be abandoned and especially at night will be a host to a whole range of spooky thoughts and ideas.