Answer:
Since many families didn't get to spend time together because they were always working now they can.
The faulty logic that the given sentence contains is B. Either-or Fallacy. An either-or fallacy is the limiting of possible answers into two or it is oversimplifying. In the given sentence above, it only gives two possible answers: either meeting the deadline, or if not the town will suffer.
Answer:
Mencius said, "There are five things which in common practice are considered unfilial. The first is .... The second is chess-playing and fondness for wine, without attending to the support and care of one's parents. This second thing supports Wang's view that between father and son reproof is the greatest offence against that tenderness which should subsist.
Explanation:
In the same connexion, Mencius says: "There
are five things which are commonly recognized to be unfilial. The first is laziness about employing legs and arms, resulting in failure to support parents. The second, gambling and chess-playing and fondness for wine, with the same result. The third, prizing goods and money and selfish devotion to wife and children, with the same result. The fourth, giving way to the temptations that assail one's eyes and ears, thus bringing his parents to shame. The fifth, reckless bravery, fighting and quarrelling, endangering thereby the happiness and the support of one's parents." (Bk. iv., pt. ii., c. xxx., v. 2.)
p. 163
Answer:
C
Explanation:
because everyone is using him for personal gains he has nobody to actually care for him.
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "B.Pahom wanted more land for himself so he could feel secure."
These are the following choices:
<span>A.Pahom wished for no more than to improve his family’s quality of life.
B.Pahom wanted more land for himself so he could feel secure.
C. Pahom wanted to please his wife, who was never satisfied.
D.Pahom wanted to gain land and defeat the Devil to avoid temptation.</span>
