Depends on your standing on it. A and B are not good options.
C is perhaps a decent counterargument, and D would be calling to their credibility.
I suggest D.
The discovery that the narrator makes by dissecting his brain is learning that his thoughts require a constant flow of pressurized air because brain activity slows due to low air pressure.
I think a law exists in the first place because it sets boundaries and lets other people know they can’t freely do whatever they want. Juvenile killers deserve life behind bars because they murdered someone and that isn’t acceptable, they know the consequences that come with their actions they made.
