1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
irga5000 [103]
3 years ago
15

1. Which definition describes Defense Policy accurately?

History
1 answer:
Arte-miy333 [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

If you just use a search engine then you will get the answer.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why did the British act alone during king Leopolds rule
Julli [10]

Answer:

Mark as brainliest

Explanation:

symbolic presence in international legal accounts of the 19th century, but for historians of the era its importance has often been doubted. This article seeks to re-interpret the place of the Berlin General Act in late 19th-century history, suggesting that the divergence of views has arisen largely as a consequence of an inattentiveness to the place of systemic logics in legal regimes of this kind.

Issue Section:

 Articles

INTRODUCTION

The Berlin West Africa Conference of 1884-1885 has assumed a canonical place in historical accounts of late 19th-century imperialism 1 and this is no less true of the accounts provided by legal scholars seeking to trace the colonial origins of contemporary international law. 2 The overt purpose of the Conference was to ‘manage’ the ongoing process of colonisation in Africa (the ‘Scramble’ as it was dubbed by a Times columnist) so as to avoid the outbreak of armed conflict between rival colonial powers. Its outcome was the conclusion of a General Act 3 ratified by all major colonial powers including the US. 4 Among other things, the General Act set out the conditions under which territory might be acquired on the coast of Africa; it internationalised two rivers (the Congo and the Niger); it orchestrated a new campaign to abolish the overland trade in slaves; and it declared as ‘neutral’ a vast swathe of Central Africa delimited as the ‘conventional basin of the Congo’. A side event was the recognition given to King Leopold’s fledgling Congo Free State that had somewhat mysteriously emerged out of the scientific and philanthropic activities of the Association internationale du Congo . 5

If for lawyers and historians the facts of the Conference are taken as a common starting point, this has not prevented widely divergent interpretations of its significance from emerging. On one side, one may find an array of international lawyers, from John Westlake 6 in the 19th century to Tony Anghie 7 in the 21 st century, affirming the importance of the Conference and its General Act for having created a legal and political framework for the subsequent partition of Africa. 8 For Anghie, Berlin ‘transformed Africa into a conceptual terra nullius ’, silencing native resistance through the subordination of their claims to sovereignty, and providing, in the process, an effective ideology of colonial rule. It was a conference, he argues, ‘which determined in important ways the future of the continent and which continues to have a profound influence on the politics of contemporary Africa’. 9

5 0
3 years ago
Which president was assasinated in office?
natita [175]
President Abraham Lincoln
6 0
3 years ago
Similarities and differences between India and Egypt's geography
timofeeve [1]
Ancient India and ancient Egypt culture looks very similar from mythologies till deities prayed in both of these civilization.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the US go to war against spain?​
Triss [41]

Answer:

The United States went to war with Spain in 1898 for three different reasons: social, economic, and political. These causes were stimulated by commercialism and nationalism. Based on these interpretations it is clear that the desire to be a world wide power, and advance commercial interest were primary factors that led to the declaration of war on Spain.

Explanation:

hope this helps you out love!! <3

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following shows the correct cause-and-effect relationship which led to World War II
fenix001 [56]

The correct cause-and-effect relationship which led to World War II is the aggressiveness of Japan, Italy, Germany and Treaty of Versailles’ that caused resentment for the German. Its effect is that this led to the use of nuclear weapons during the war and later led to the Cold War.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which precedent and did institutions of the Roman Republic set
    11·1 answer
  • Which civilization emerged first in the Mediterranean region
    11·1 answer
  • What triggered the financial crisis of 2008 in the United States?
    5·2 answers
  • Which statement best explains the importance of these Supreme Court decisions?
    7·1 answer
  • How big is a ziggurat?
    12·1 answer
  • "Blowin' in the Wind" and "The Times They Are A-Changin'" became theme songs for the counterculture because their messages suppo
    15·2 answers
  • Giuseppe Mazzini was known as ?
    14·1 answer
  • The first African country to achieve independence was
    9·2 answers
  • How can the federal government influence the economy? A. change government spending levels B. change tax levels C. do both A and
    6·1 answer
  • Why is it important to be able to interpret data?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!