You cannot compute for the capital in excess of par since you don’t have the number of shares but let us assume there are 100,000 shares.
If the Company sell 100,000 shares of its common stock for $2 per share, and the par value of each share is $5, then the amount of the capital in excess of par is 100,000 shares x $3/share, = 300,000 and is recorded:
Cash 500,000
Common stock ($2 x 100000) 200000
Additional Paid-In Capital($3 x 100000) 300000
Answer:
Part a: The probability of breaking even in 6 tosses is 0.3125.
Part b: The probability that one payer wins all the money after the 10th toss is 0.0264.
Explanation:
Part a
P(success)=1/2=0.5
P(Failure)=1/2=0.5
Now for the break-even at the sixth toss
P(Break Even)=P(3 success out of 6)
P(3 success out of 6)
So the probability of breaking even in 6 tosses is 0.3125.
Part b:
So the probability that one of the player wins all the money after the 10th toss is given as the tenth toss is given as a win so
Wins in 9 tosses is given as 9!/7!=72
The probability that the other person wins
Wins in 8 out of 10 tosses is given as 10!/8!(10-8)!=10!/8!2!=45
So the probability of all the money is won by one of the gambler after the 10th toss is given as
P=number of wins in 9 tosses-Number of wins in 10 tosses/total number of tosses
P=(72-45)/2^16
P=0.0264
So the probability that one payer wins all the money after the 10th toss is 0.0264.
Answer:
$18
Explanation:
The contribution margin per patron is the ratio of the total contribution to the number of patrons. The total contribution is the difference between the total sales and the total variable cost.
Hence, the contribution per matron may also be derived as the difference between the sales per patron and the variable cost per patron.
The variable cost here is the cost of providing dinner per ticket as such,
Contribution margin per patron
= $40 - $22
= $18
Answer: Trained incapacity
Explanation: In simple words, it refers to the idea that after gaining a certain kind of education, skill or experience etc. the level of thinking of an individual cannot go beyond a certain limit.
In the given case, the manager was the upper level employee and was not habitual to the work that was performed by the workers in the restaurant.
Therefore this position in the workplace limited his skills of performing only the managerial work.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the above case depicts trained incapacity.
