The United States was at war with England because of King James taking over the U.S. and making them pay unfair taxes.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
to ensure the survival of Germany for generations to come.
Answer:
During the Vietnam War the U.S military used the television and photographs as propaganda in order to persuade the people that the war was nothing but a war and the military needed public support to get through it.
Answer: It allows the reader to understand the lingering terror of the journey.
Explanation:
The description of the train's sound in the book titled "Night" by Elie Wiesel was to show what happens before death after there have been a lot of suffering. He used the sound of the train in order to show that there is still one final stage of pain to go through. This is justified by the expressions where it was stated that "a train rattles along Germany and that the train was filled with a moaning sound"
This give a graphic description of the sorrow and the pain that they the people had to go through. Therefore, Wiesel's unique point of view about the sound of a train whistle impacts the reader as it allows the reader to understand the lingering terror of the journey.
Answer: Appointing judges to the court.
Explanation: Firstly, enforcing a law doesn’t really limit the power of the judicial branch because they can simply strike down the law if it’s unconstitutional. Secondly, the President does not have the power to approve judicial nominations. That is only the Senate’s job. The President can appoint or nominate them, but the Senate is the one who approves.
Also, vetoing laws doesn’t limit the Judicial Branch’s power really in any way. Now, the correct answer is: Appointing judges / justices to the courts. This is because this power can not be limited at all by the judicial branch, only by congress. The Senate can deny the confirmation / appointment of a President’s appointee, and the Congress can also impeach that appointee later on for committed high crimes. The Judicial Branch can’t do any of that. The President can limit the Judiciary’s power by appointing judges that will go against any potential agenda of the Judicial Branch. For instance, if there happens to be liberal Supreme Court, whereas a majority of the members of the Supreme Court identify as liberal or were appointed by a Democratic President, a Republican President may want to nominate / appoint a conservative Justice or Justices to cancel out their majority and re-take the majority of the court. Honestly, this was a poorly worded question (not your fault at all, but the person who wrote it) because this doesn’t limit the power of the Judicial Branch in terms of its constitutional structure and powers, it merely limits and restricts the narrative or agenda of the members of the branch. Anyway, your answer is B: Appointing judges to the court.
