Ancient egypt was very dry. It was mainly made out of deserts
The correct answer is validity
The perfect validity signals that there is no measurement error, that is, that “the differences observed in the measurement reflect the real differences between the objects (or individuals)” .
In general, content validation consists of “showing that the test items are samples of the universe in which the researcher is interested”, proving that this sample is indeed representative. A measurement of any kind is valid when it actually measures what it is proposing to measure. The researcher, when defining a method and a sample for a given study, must pay attention so that external factors do not exert any influence on the variables involved, under penalty of having their final results deviated in a biased way. Some bias or trend can occur in several aspects of the research, not only in the definition of the method and the sample.
The idea of validation also involves the concern with a neutral way of writing the questions of an instrument, the way of practicing the interviews for data collection, recording, information processing and dissemination of results.
In the previous figure, it can be seen that in the zone of low validity, although the pitches are well concentrated among themselves, the focus is shifted. This, in the practical case of a survey, could mean the existence of some tendency, since all records are being displaced from the central objective (as an example, one can quote an interviewer who induces the respondent to a certain answer).
Answer:
A deductive argument is one formed by two premises and a conclusion.
Explanation:
The deductive argument is also called a syllogism and has a very simple structure. This type of argument is made up of two premises and a conclusion. The first of these premises should present generalized and more universal information, but the second premise and conclusion should be less generalized and more specific. An example of a deductive argument is:
All politicians are corrupt. John is a politician. Therefore, John is corrupt.
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
"While exploring a rock formation, Hiroto finds a rock that has footprints pressed into it. A geologist tells Hiroto that the rock is millions of years old. Which of these statements is correct about Hiroto’s find?
A.It is not a fossil, because footprints are not fossils. B.It is not a fossil, because only whole organisms are fossils. C.It is a fossil only if Hiroto finds actual parts of the organism in rocks nearby. D.It is a fossil because footprints of organisms from million of years ago are considered to be fossils.
"
Answer:
D.It is a fossil because footprints of organisms from million of years ago are considered to be fossils.
Explanation:
Fossils are body remains of animals and plants trapped in rocks for thousands of years. These traces can be parts of the body, body structure, tracks, footprints, among others. An example of this can be seen in the question above, where Hiroto found a mark caused by an animal on a rock. In short, Hiroto found a rock with pressed footprints that is approximately millions of years old. He found a fossil.
Answer:
Ferrari F430, with a mind-popping $3,770.00 price tag.
